Skip to content

Conversation

@JWinermaSplunk
Copy link
Collaborator

@JWinermaSplunk JWinermaSplunk commented Oct 14, 2025

Description

Add retrieval span support to dev.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A

Does This PR Require a Core Repo Change?

  • Yes. - Link to PR:
  • No.

Checklist:

See contributing.md for styleguide, changelog guidelines, and more.

  • Followed the style guidelines of this project
  • Changelogs have been updated
  • Unit tests have been added
  • Documentation has been updated

@JWinermaSplunk JWinermaSplunk changed the title initial commit Retrieval Support Dev Oct 14, 2025
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

self._telemetry_handler = handler
self._entities: dict[UUID, GenAI] = {}
self._llms: dict[UUID, UtilLLMInvocation] = {}
self._retrievals: dict[UUID, UtilRetrievalInvocation] = {}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondering if storing retrieval calls like this is necessary with this iteration?

@adityamehra
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM :shipit:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants