Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
|
⏳ Code review in progress. Analyzing for code quality issues and best practices. Detailed findings will be posted upon completion. Using Amazon Q Developer for GitHubAmazon Q Developer1 is an AI-powered assistant that integrates directly into your GitHub workflow, enhancing your development process with intelligent features for code development, review, and transformation. Slash Commands
FeaturesAgentic Chat Code Review CustomizationYou can create project-specific rules for Amazon Q Developer to follow:
Example rule: FeedbackTo provide feedback on Amazon Q Developer, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository. For more detailed information, visit the Amazon Q for GitHub documentation. Footnotes
|
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
![amazon-q-developer[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1220912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've reviewed the addition of the Fortify AST workflow file. While it's great to see security scanning being implemented, there are several important security configuration issues that should be addressed:
- The workflow currently includes configuration for both Fortify on Demand and Software Security Center, which could lead to confusion and misconfigurations. Choose and implement one approach.
- The workflow uses a hardcoded action version instead of a major version tag, potentially missing security updates.
- The trigger configuration could lead to duplicate scans on the same code.
- Security policy checks are not enforced, which could allow vulnerabilities to slip through.
Please address these concerns to ensure a robust and secure scanning implementation. The workflow will be more effective with these improvements in place.
| actions: read | ||
| contents: read | ||
| security-events: write | ||
| # pull-requests: write # Required if DO_PR_COMMENT is set to true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 [Security Configuration]: The workflow is configured to expose both Fortify on Demand (FoD) and Software Security Center (SSC) configurations simultaneously, which could lead to confusion and potential misconfiguration1. You should choose and configure only one scanning approach - either FoD or SSC, not both.
Footnotes
-
CWE-16: Configuration - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/16.html ↩
| # Perform SAST and/or SCA scan via Fortify on Demand/Fortify Hosted/ScanCentral SAST/Debricked. Based on | ||
| # configuration, the Fortify GitHub Action can optionally set up the application version/release, generate | ||
| # job summaries and Pull Request comments, and/or export SAST results to the GitHub code scanning dashboard. | ||
| # The Fortify GitHub Action provides many customization capabilities, but in case further customization is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 [Security Configuration]: The workflow is using a hardcoded version of the Fortify GitHub Action (ef5539bf4bd9c45c0bd971978f635a69eae55297). While this provides stability, it may miss critical security updates. Consider using the major version tag @v1 to automatically receive security patches while maintaining compatibility.
| push: | ||
| branches: [ "master" ] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| # The branches below must be a subset of the branches above |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 [Security Configuration]: The workflow is configured to run on both push and pull_request events targeting the master branch. This could lead to duplicate scans and unnecessary resource usage. Consider running full scans only on push to master and scheduled events, while using lighter security checks for pull requests.
| sast-scan: true # Run a SAST scan; if not specified or set to false, no SAST scan will be run | ||
| debricked-sca-scan: true # For FoD, run an open-source scan as part of the SAST scan (ignored if SAST scan | ||
| # is disabled). For SSC, run a Debricked scan and import results into SSC. | ||
| env: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛑 [Security Best Practice]: The workflow is not enforcing a minimum security policy check. Setting DO_POLICY_CHECK: true is recommended to fail the pipeline if security policy outcomes indicate critical vulnerabilities1.
Footnotes
-
CWE-1008: Architectural Concepts - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1008.html ↩
|
Closing because this tool requires a Fortify on Demand account and I couldn't find a way to get a free one for OSS. |
1 participant
No description provided.