Skip to content

style: Clarify a comment in tests/wasm32.rs#618

Merged
Pr0methean merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ai-findings-autofix/tests-wasm32.rs
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

style: Clarify a comment in tests/wasm32.rs#618
Pr0methean merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
ai-findings-autofix/tests-wasm32.rs

Conversation

@Pr0methean
Copy link
Member

This PR applies 1/1 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <[email protected]>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a code quality finding by improving the clarity of a comment within the WASM test suite. The update provides crucial context for developers regarding a specific dependency requirement (the time crate with its wasm-bindgen feature) when running end-to-end tests on WASM32, aiming to prevent potential confusion about test failures.

Highlights

  • Documentation Improvement: Updated a comment in tests/wasm32.rs to provide a more detailed explanation regarding the time crate's wasm-bindgen feature requirement for end_to_end tests on WASM32 targets. This clarifies why tests might fail with "time not implemented on this platform".
Changelog
  • tests/wasm32.rs
    • Updated a comment to explain the dependency on the wasm-bindgen feature for the time crate when running end_to_end tests on wasm32 targets, clarifying potential runtime errors.
Activity
  • The pull request was created by Pr0methean.
  • No further activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded since its creation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@Pr0methean Pr0methean changed the title Potential fix for 1 code quality finding style: Clarify a comment in tests/wasm32.rs Feb 3, 2026
@Pr0methean Pr0methean marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 23:22
Copy link
Contributor

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR title should follow Conventional Commits format and start with a type prefix. For documentation changes, use docs: (e.g., "docs: improve wasm32 time feature comment clarity"). The code changes themselves are acceptable.


You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

@Pr0methean Pr0methean enabled auto-merge February 3, 2026 23:22
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves a comment in tests/wasm32.rs to provide a clearer explanation for why the time crate requires the wasm-bindgen feature when compiling for wasm32 targets. The updated comment is more descriptive and accurate, which is a good improvement for code clarity and maintainability. The change is correct and I have no further suggestions.

@Pr0methean Pr0methean added this to the 7.3.0 milestone Feb 3, 2026
@Pr0methean Pr0methean added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit ca432a0 Feb 4, 2026
130 checks passed
@Pr0methean Pr0methean deleted the ai-findings-autofix/tests-wasm32.rs branch February 4, 2026 04:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant