Skip to content

Conversation

@AncD8972
Copy link

@AncD8972 AncD8972 commented Jan 3, 2026

Mirrored from ai-code-review-evaluation#10.

Test 10

Copy link
Author

@AncD8972 AncD8972 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 DiffCOT AI Code Review

The PR adds a null check in GroupAdapter.getSubGroupsCount() to prevent NPE during concurrent group access, adds an @OverRide annotation, removes unused code, and adds a concurrency test.

Assessment Score
⚠️ REQUEST_CHANGES 7/10

✅ Positive Aspects

  • Good defensive programming by adding null check to prevent NPE in concurrent scenarios
  • The test properly simulates concurrent access patterns that could trigger the original bug
  • Clean removal of unused method in GroupUtils improves code maintainability
  • Adding @OverRide annotation improves code clarity and enables compiler checking

💡 Suggestions for Improvement

  • Consider adding @nullable annotation to getSubGroupsCount() if null return is intentional
  • Consider making the concurrency test more robust by adding assertions about expected behavior
  • Document why modelSupplier.get() can return null in this specific scenario

🔍 Issues Found: 3

  • 🔴 High: 0
  • 🟡 Medium: 2
  • 🟢 Low: 1

See inline comments below for details.


Generated by DiffCOT AI Code Review

Comment on lines +274 to +275
GroupModel model = modelSupplier.get();
return model == null ? null : model.getSubGroupsCount();
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 MEDIUM | bug

Returning null from getSubGroupsCount() when model is null may cause NPE in callers that expect a Long value. This is a defensive fix but shifts the NPE risk to callers.

💡 Suggestion: Consider returning 0L instead of null, or document the null return value with @nullable annotation.

Suggested change
GroupModel model = modelSupplier.get();
return model == null ? null : model.getSubGroupsCount();
GroupModel model = modelSupplier.get();
return model == null ? 0L : model.getSubGroupsCount();



@Test
public void createMultiDeleteMultiReadMulti() {
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 LOW | typo

Variable name 'groupUuuids' has an extra 'u' - should be 'groupUuids'.

💡 Suggestion: Fix the typo in variable name.

Suggested change
public void createMultiDeleteMultiReadMulti() {
List<String> groupUuids = new ArrayList<>();

Comment on lines +147 to +148
}
}
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 MEDIUM | logic_defect

The test creates a thread but never joins it, which could cause the test to finish before the thread completes, making the test unreliable.

💡 Suggestion: Store the thread reference and join it after setting deletedAll to true.

Suggested change
}
}
Thread readerThread = new Thread(() -> {
while (!deletedAll.get()) {
try {
// just loading briefs
managedRealm.admin().groups().groups(null, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE, true);
} catch (Exception e) {
caughtExceptions.add(e);
}
}
});
readerThread.start();
// delete groups
groupUuuids.forEach(groupUuid -> {
managedRealm.admin().groups().group(groupUuid).remove();
});
deletedAll.set(true);
try {
readerThread.join(5000); // Wait max 5 seconds for thread to finish
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants