Skip to content

Conversation

@AncD8972
Copy link

@AncD8972 AncD8972 commented Jan 3, 2026

Mirrored from ai-code-review-evaluation#9.

Test 9


return true;
} else if (input.getType().equals(RecoveryAuthnCodesCredentialModel.TYPE)) {
CredentialModel recoveryCodesModel = new CredentialModel();
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH | security

Recovery codes are stored as plain JSON in credentialData without encryption. This could expose sensitive authentication data.

💡 Suggestion: Consider encrypting the recovery codes before storing them, similar to how passwords are hashed. At minimum, add a comment explaining this is test code and production should use encryption.

Suggested change
CredentialModel recoveryCodesModel = new CredentialModel();
// TODO: In production, recovery codes should be encrypted before storage
recoveryCodesModel.setCredentialData(input.getChallengeResponse());

Comment on lines +235 to +237
if (myUser.recoveryCodes != null) {
try {
model = RecoveryAuthnCodesCredentialModel.createFromValues(
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 LOW | best_practice

IOException is caught but only logged, which could hide critical issues during credential deserialization. This might mask data corruption or other serious problems.

💡 Suggestion: Consider adding more detailed error handling or rethrowing as a runtime exception to ensure critical issues are not silently ignored.

Suggested change
if (myUser.recoveryCodes != null) {
try {
model = RecoveryAuthnCodesCredentialModel.createFromValues(
} catch (IOException e) {
log.error("Failed to deserialize recovery codes credential for user " + user.getUsername(), e);
// Return empty list to prevent NPE, but consider if this should be a harder failure
return Collections.emptyList();
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants