Skip to content

chore: Cherry-pick of caching service stability test to v2#4541

Open
pavel-jares-bcm wants to merge 4 commits intov2.x.xfrom
reboot/v2-caching-stability-test
Open

chore: Cherry-pick of caching service stability test to v2#4541
pavel-jares-bcm wants to merge 4 commits intov2.x.xfrom
reboot/v2-caching-stability-test

Conversation

@pavel-jares-bcm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR cherry-picks the stability test written in #4463

Linked to # (issue)
Part of the # (epic)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • feat: New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • docs: Change in a documentation
  • refactor: Refactor the code
  • chore: Chore, repository cleanup, updates the dependencies.
  • BREAKING CHANGE or !: Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • PR title conforms to commit message guideline ## Commit Message Structure Guideline
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. In JS I did provide JSDoc
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • The java tests in the area I was working on leverage @nested annotations
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

For more details about how should the code look like read the Contributing guideline

Signed-off-by: Pavel Jareš <Pavel.Jares@broadcom.com>
pavel-jares-bcm and others added 2 commits April 7, 2026 16:14
Signed-off-by: Pavel Jareš <Pavel.Jares@broadcom.com>
@pavel-jares-bcm pavel-jares-bcm requested a review from nxhafa April 8, 2026 08:04
@pavel-jares-bcm pavel-jares-bcm marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2026 08:04
@balhar-jakub balhar-jakub moved this from New to In Progress in API Mediation Layer Backlog Management Apr 8, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
66.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants