Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2026. It is now read-only.

docs(specs): bootstrap spec + roadmap flow#212

Merged
LucasSantana-Dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/specs-bootstrap
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

docs(specs): bootstrap spec + roadmap flow#212
LucasSantana-Dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/specs-bootstrap

Conversation

@LucasSantana-Dev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LucasSantana-Dev LucasSantana-Dev commented Apr 15, 2026

Seeds the per-feature spec + derived roadmap flow (see companion ai-dev-toolkit/kit/specs/README.md). One placeholder spec + auto-generated docs/roadmap.md. Docs only. No runtime impact.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated project roadmap with improved formatting and structure
    • Established framework for feature specification and roadmap workflow, including guidance for creating dated specification documents and managing the feature development lifecycle

Seeds the docs/specs/<date>-<slug>/ structure and derived docs/roadmap.md.
Generator: ~/.claude/rag-index/specs.py (personal tooling).
See: companion ai-dev-toolkit/kit/specs/ for the flow.

No runtime impact.
@LucasSantana-Dev LucasSantana-Dev requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2026 22:11
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@LucasSantana-Dev has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 55 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 55 minutes and 0 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 07c17c9c-010c-4815-9eda-346f7b5e9e10

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46f18d8 and dd8b8af.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request establishes a roadmap specification system by updating the core roadmap file and introducing new placeholder spec documentation. It defines the workflow for managing future feature work using dated markdown files with YAML frontmatter, where the roadmap is regenerated from spec entries based on their status.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Roadmap Documentation
docs/roadmap.md
Updated header formatting (em dash) and added new "2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder" entry with placeholder tag; reformatted existing ecosystem roadmap specs entry.
Roadmap Placeholder Spec
docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md, docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/tasks.md
Added new spec and tasks files establishing the spec + roadmap workflow bootstrap, including instructions for using dated spec/task markdown files and regenerating the roadmap from spec status entries.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~4 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/S

Poem

🐰 A placeholder hops into the roadmap so neat,
With specs and with tasks, our workflow's complete!
Dated files dancing in organized rows,
The springtime of structure abundantly grows! 🌱

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs(specs): bootstrap spec + roadmap flow' directly and clearly summarizes the main change: establishing a new spec and roadmap workflow for documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/specs-bootstrap

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

Forge AI Quality Gate

Passed — Score 100/100 (A+) · Delta +0 · 0 new findings

Category scores
Category Score
test-autogen 100

Powered by Forge AI Action · forgespace.co

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

Project Scorecard


Scorecard: 84/100 (B)
────────────────────────────────────────
  security: 100/100 (A)
  quality: 80/100 (B) — 1 violations
  performance: 67/100 (D) — 1 violations
  compliance: 75/100 (C) — 1 violations
  dependency: 100/100 (A)

Recommendations:
  - Increase test coverage to meet the 80% threshold
  - Extend log retention to at least 90 days for compliance

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md (1)

1-7: Consider populating the pr: field.

The pr: field in the YAML frontmatter is empty. Since this spec is being introduced in PR #212, consider populating it with the PR number for better traceability and completeness of the spec metadata.

📝 Proposed enhancement
 ---
 status: proposed
 created: 2026-04-15
 owner: lucassantana
-pr:
+pr: 212
 tags: placeholder
 ---
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md` around lines 1 - 7, The
YAML frontmatter is missing the PR reference in the pr: field; update the
frontmatter in spec.md by setting pr: 212 (or the appropriate PR number) so the
metadata includes the PR that introduced this spec—look for the YAML block
beginning with --- and the pr: key and add the PR number as its value.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md`:
- Around line 1-7: The YAML frontmatter is missing the PR reference in the pr:
field; update the frontmatter in spec.md by setting pr: 212 (or the appropriate
PR number) so the metadata includes the PR that introduced this spec—look for
the YAML block beginning with --- and the pr: key and add the PR number as its
value.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 959cb77a-5757-4527-9089-dc3230b51bac

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between feee1ee and 46f18d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • docs/roadmap.md
  • docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md
  • docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/tasks.md

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@LucasSantana-Dev LucasSantana-Dev merged commit 6af7c0b into main Apr 15, 2026
30 checks passed
@LucasSantana-Dev LucasSantana-Dev deleted the chore/specs-bootstrap branch April 15, 2026 22:19
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant