Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Epistemic Gatekeepers and Epistemic Injustice by Design

Fiduciary Failures in Institutional Knowledge Gatekeeping

alt text

by Peter Kahl; independent scholar; published 26 June 2025

Abstract

In this paper, I critically examine institutional epistemic gatekeepers—including academic platforms such as PhilPapers, JSTOR, major publishers, and academic repositories—as fiduciaries entrusted with safeguarding epistemic diversity, justice, and integrity. I argue that current institutional policies systematically domesticate and marginalise diverse epistemologies through restrictive registration requirements, monomodal publication frameworks, opaque peer-review processes, and disciplinary siloisation. Drawing on my original scholarship and recent critical insights—particularly concerning epistemic humility, epistemic transposition, and epistemic domestication—I critique these gatekeeping practices as fiduciary breaches that exacerbate socioeconomic, academic, and epistemic stratification. I advocate concrete fiduciary and epistemic reforms, including transparent review processes, representational inclusivity, multimodal and multilingual scholarly frameworks, and institutional oversight committees committed to epistemic plurality and accountability. Ultimately, this paper calls upon scholarly communities and institutions to actively honour their fiduciary responsibilities, thereby fostering genuine epistemic openness, plurality, and justice.

Keywords

epistemic gatekeepers, epistemic injustice, epistemic domestication, fiduciary responsibility, epistemic humility, epistemic transposition, multimodal epistemologies, multilingual scholarship, epistemic exclusion, institutional gatekeeping, representational diversity, academic stratification, epistemic plurality, epistemic accountability, interdisciplinary scholarship, epistemic marginalisation, microfascism, epistemic democracy, scholarly communication, institutional reform


Correspondence regarding this work is welcome.

Download this scholarly work as a PDF for sharing and citation: PDF download

Cite this work:

Peter Kahl, ‘Epistemic Gatekeepers and Epistemic Injustice by Design: Fiduciary Failures in Institutional Knowledge Gatekeeping’ (Github, 2025) <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Peter-Kahl/Epistemic-Gatekeepers-and-Epistemic-Injustice-by-Design/master/Kahl%20P%2C%20Epistemic%20Gatekeepers%20and%20Epistemic%20Injustice%20by%20Design%20(26%20June%202025).pdf>

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

About

In this paper, I critically examine institutional epistemic gatekeepers—including academic platforms such as PhilPapers, JSTOR, major publishers, and academic repositories—as fiduciaries entrusted with safeguarding epistemic diversity, justice, and integrity.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors