Improve Japanese Selenium details documentation

[noritaka1166]

Description

Improve the Japanese translation of the Selenium details documentation.

• Align headings and content with the English source page
• Improve unclear or overly literal Japanese phrasing
• Standardize browser and Grid terminology
• Add the missing note that project volunteers also have day jobs
• Preserve the existing Grid link and page structure

Motivation and Context

The Japanese page contained unclear translations, inconsistent terminology, and omitted one sentence from the English source page.
This change improves readability and restores content parity with the English documentation.

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for selenium-dev ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2059177
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/selenium-dev/deploys/6a70896a753f1900083c6d05
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2727--selenium-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes	Run an agent on this branch

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Improve Japanese Selenium details page translation parity and terminology

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 10 minutes

AI Description

• Align Japanese “Details” page headings and content with the English source.
• Improve unclear Japanese phrasing and standardize browser/Grid terminology.
• Restore a missing note about volunteers having day jobs while preserving links.

Diagram

graph TD
A["details.ja.md"] --> B["grid.md (ref link)"]

Loading

High-Level Assessment

Manual translation edits are the right approach here: they preserve existing structure and links while restoring parity and improving readability. No materially better alternative is warranted for this scope.

Files changed (1) +26 / -40

Documentation (1) +26 / -40

details.ja.mdRefine Japanese “Selenium details” translation and restore missing sentence +26/-40

Refine Japanese “Selenium details” translation and restore missing sentence

• Updates the page title, headings, and body text to better match the English source while improving naturalness and consistency in Japanese. Standardizes browser/Grid terminology, keeps the existing Grid link intact, and adds the previously missing note that volunteers have day jobs.

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (1) 📜 Skill insights (0)

Context used

✅ Compliance rules (platform): 10 rules

1. JavaScript referenced in prose 📘 Rule violation ✧ Quality

Description

The updated Japanese documentation includes a language-specific term (JavaScript) in general
descriptive prose. This contradicts the style guide requirement that references to code should be
language independent.

Code

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[20]

+また、マウス移動や任意のJavaScriptの実行など、ほかにも多数の機能を提供します。

Evidence

The central style guide explicitly requires that references to code be language independent, while
the changed Japanese page introduces JavaScript in general prose describing Selenium
functionality.

Rule 2141344: Documentation changes must follow the central style guide file
website_and_docs/content/documentation/about/style.en.md[74-78]
website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[18-20]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The documentation prose uses a language-specific term (`JavaScript`) in a general feature description, which conflicts with the documentation style guide requirement to keep references to code language independent.

## Issue Context
This is not a code example section; it is general descriptive content. Consider rephrasing to a language-agnostic term such as "スクリプト" (or equivalent wording aligned with the English source while remaining language-neutral).

## Fix Focus Areas
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[18-21]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

_{To customize comments, go to the Qodo configuration screen, or learn more in the docs.}

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

Context used

✅ Compliance rules (platform): 10 rules

1. Error report nuance lost ✓ Resolved 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness ⭐ New

Description

The updated Japanese sentence "エラーが発生すると通知します" is understandable, but it no longer explicitly
conveys the English source’s “reporting back to you when errors occur,” reducing translation parity
and clarity about what is reported back.

Code

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[R52-53]

+プログラミングインターフェースを介して、これらのテストは並列で休むことなく実行され、
+エラーが発生すると通知します。

Evidence

The Japanese text ends the paragraph with a generic notification statement, while the English source
explicitly says the tests “report back to you” when errors occur; aligning the Japanese phrasing
improves parity with the source documentation.

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[49-53]
website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.en.md[67-70]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
In the Japanese translation, the clause describing what happens on errors was changed to a more generic "notify" phrasing. This loses the explicit “reporting back to you” nuance present in the English source, reducing content parity.

## Issue Context
English source: “these tests will run tirelessly in parallel, reporting back to you when errors occur.”
Current Japanese: “…実行され、エラーが発生すると通知します。”

## Fix Focus Areas
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[52-53]

## Suggested change
Adjust the last clause to explicitly indicate a report/feedback is returned to the user, e.g.:
- 「エラーが発生すると（ユーザーに）報告します。」
- or 「エラーが発生すると報告が返されます。」
Choose the wording that best matches the intended tone of the page while preserving the English meaning.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

2. Overlong prose lines in details.ja.md ✓ Resolved 📘 Rule violation ✧ Quality

Description

The updated Japanese documentation introduces very long single-line paragraphs that exceed the style
guide’s ~100 character line-length convention, making diffs and reviews harder to read. This
conflicts with the central documentation style guide referenced by the compliance checklist.

Code

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16]

+_Selenium_ にはさまざまな側面がありますが、その中核は、ブラウザインスタンスをリモートで制御し、ユーザーとブラウザのやりとりをエミュレートするために利用可能な最良の技術を用いる、Webブラウザ自動化のためのツールセットです。

Evidence

The style guide explicitly recommends keeping documentation source lines around 100 characters. The
modified page includes newly-added single-line paragraphs (e.g., line 16) that are far longer than
this convention.

Rule 2141344: Documentation changes must follow the central style guide file
website_and_docs/content/documentation/about/style.en.md[40-45]
website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16-16]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The modified Japanese documentation contains very long single-line paragraphs, which conflicts with the style guide recommendation to keep source lines around ~100 characters.

## Issue Context
The central style guide asks contributors to limit line length to around 100 characters (or use semantic linefeeds) to keep diffs readable.

## Fix Focus Areas
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16-42]
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/about/style.en.md[40-45]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

_{To customize comments, go to the Qodo configuration screen, or learn more in the docs.}

Previous review results

Review updated until commit 2059177

Results up to commit b35385b ⚖️ Balanced

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0) 🎨 UX issues (0) 🔗 Cross-repo conflicts (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

1. Overlong prose lines in details.ja.md ✓ Resolved 📘 Rule violation ✧ Quality

Description

The updated Japanese documentation introduces very long single-line paragraphs that exceed the style
guide’s ~100 character line-length convention, making diffs and reviews harder to read. This
conflicts with the central documentation style guide referenced by the compliance checklist.

Code

website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16]

+_Selenium_ にはさまざまな側面がありますが、その中核は、ブラウザインスタンスをリモートで制御し、ユーザーとブラウザのやりとりをエミュレートするために利用可能な最良の技術を用いる、Webブラウザ自動化のためのツールセットです。

Evidence

The style guide explicitly recommends keeping documentation source lines around 100 characters. The
modified page includes newly-added single-line paragraphs (e.g., line 16) that are far longer than
this convention.

Rule 2141344: Documentation changes must follow the central style guide file
website_and_docs/content/documentation/about/style.en.md[40-45]
website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16-16]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

## Issue description
The modified Japanese documentation contains very long single-line paragraphs, which conflicts with the style guide recommendation to keep source lines around ~100 characters.

## Issue Context
The central style guide asks contributors to limit line length to around 100 characters (or use semantic linefeeds) to keep diffs readable.

## Fix Focus Areas
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/overview/details.ja.md[16-42]
- website_and_docs/content/documentation/about/style.en.md[40-45]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

[qodo-code-review]

Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit e6a2c05

[qodo-code-review]

Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit 7b3a892

[qodo-code-review]

Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit 2059177