Skip to content

Add OpenClaw agent templates (177 agents across 24 categories) - #92

Open
mergisi wants to merge 1 commit into
ashishpatel26:mainfrom
mergisi:add-openclaw-agent-templates
Open

Add OpenClaw agent templates (177 agents across 24 categories)#92
mergisi wants to merge 1 commit into
ashishpatel26:mainfrom
mergisi:add-openclaw-agent-templates

Conversation

@mergisi

@mergisi mergisi commented Mar 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Added OpenClaw Agent Templates to the Use Case Table
  • 177 production-ready AI agent templates for the OpenClaw framework
  • Covers 24 categories: Marketing, DevOps, Finance, Healthcare, Legal, HR, and more
  • Link: https://github.com/mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents

Format

Entry follows the existing table format with GitHub badge link, matching the style of other entries in the Use Case Table.

Added OpenClaw Agent Templates to the Use Case Table as a multi-industry
entry with 177 production-ready AI agent templates covering Marketing,
DevOps, Finance, Healthcare, Legal, HR, and more.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ashishpatel26

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for this, and sorry for the slow reply - I'm working through the backlog properly now.

The README was overhauled in #120, so this branch no longer merges cleanly. Could you rebase onto current main? Once it's mergeable I'll review it properly.

git remote add upstream https://github.com/ashishpatel26/500-AI-Agents-Projects.git
git fetch upstream
git rebase upstream/main
git push --force-with-lease

If I don't hear back in two weeks I'll close it to keep the queue honest - no hard feelings, and you're welcome to reopen any time.

@ashishpatel26

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Following up on my earlier note - I've now verified the project itself rather than just flagging the merge conflict.

OpenClaw agent templates (3.9k stars, MIT) checks out: the repo is real, properly licensed and maintained. I want this in the list.

The only thing standing in the way is the rebase. Once this merges cleanly against current main I'll merge it - so the effort won't be wasted, and please ignore the two-week wording in my previous comment for this one. Ping me when it's rebased and I'll get to it quickly.

Thanks for your patience with the backlog 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants