Skip to content

Week 6 work#10

Merged
aslavchev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
week-06-work
Dec 8, 2025
Merged

Week 6 work#10
aslavchev merged 1 commit intomainfrom
week-06-work

Conversation

@kamenAsenov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Week Submission

Week Number: <6>
Topic: Advanced testing techniques>
Mentee Name:

📋 Completed Deliverables

  • [ v ] All exercises completed
  • [ v ] Test cases written (if applicable)
  • [ v ] Bug reports documented (if applicable)
  • [ v ] All files in correct location (mentee-work/week-XX/)
  • [ v ] Followed templates from curriculum/templates/
  • [ v ] Reviewed my own work for quality

@kamenAsenov kamenAsenov requested a review from aslavchev December 7, 2025 14:51
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@aslavchev aslavchev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Week 6 — Approved

Kamen, you tackled some of the hardest QA concepts yet—risk assessment, pairwise testing, coverage analysis. These are master-level topics and you're at Week 6. Respect for attempting them.

Grade: 76/100

This is your most ambitious week, and the concepts are there. A few things to level up for next time:

Pairwise: Make sure all parameter pairs are covered (use AllPairs tool to verify)

Error Guessing: Separate true "gut feeling" guesses from formal negative tests

Risk Assessment: Add 1-2 sentence justifications for each risk rating (why High? why Low?)

Coverage: Show the math - "X features / Y total = Z%" (can't just say "75%")

What you did well:
✅ Found real bugs in exploratory testing
✅ Security awareness (XSS, SQL injection)
✅ Strategic thinking in risk/coverage docs

Advanced techniques take practice. Week 7 (Test Planning) will build on this. Keep pushing!

Average: 82.3/100 (6/11 weeks complete - halfway there!) 🚀

@aslavchev aslavchev merged commit b189d1f into main Dec 8, 2025
@aslavchev aslavchev deleted the week-06-work branch December 8, 2025 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants