Conversation
|
@hefniraera Great! Is it normal that the input layer for near and small are so different from the others? |
For both, apparently I set wrong value parameter. I was also wondering why they seemed off. Let me figure out what's best for them. |
|
Thanks for doing this! |
Hi @baswein, yes, the left is the output raster and the right is the vectorized output raster. Sorry for the confusion. I created them based on the old example (fuzzify raster gaussian). However, as we predicted, the vectorized output may confuse the user, so we plan to fix and redo it. I'm working on the new ones. Please don't hesitate if you have an idea on how to improve them. Thanks. |
|
I don't really understand the math fully but I found this writeup that helps me understand it better. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/a-Fuzzy-Large-m-x-is-the-membership-value-of-category-x-f-2-is-the-midpoint-and-f_fig3_286212486 |
Goal:
Add visual examples for fuzzify raster algs in the raster analysis, including:
Ticket(s): #