AI deployment policy drift tracker.
Answers one deterministic question: Has this AI deployment drifted from its approved policy baseline?
PolicyDriftDossier compares an observed AI deployment state against an approved policy baseline and produces a 3-way verdict:
- aligned — all required clauses match the baseline
- drift — some clauses differ but remain within tolerance
- breach — a required clause is outside tolerance or missing
It is a direct transplant of two corpus primitives:
- DriftDossier (clinical protocol drift compilation) → policy drift engine
- CertMesh (robot behavior policy drift certification) → severity aggregate gate
aligned → drift → breach
python policy_drift_dossier.py sample --out examples/
python policy_drift_dossier.py run --baseline examples/baseline.json --state examples/state_drift.json
python policy_drift_dossier.py report --result result.jsoncd PolicyDriftDossier
python policy_drift_dossier.py sample --out examples/
python policy_drift_dossier.py run --baseline examples/baseline.json --state examples/state_aligned.json --format markdown
python policy_drift_dossier.py run --baseline examples/baseline.json --state examples/state_breach.json --format jsonEvery run produces both machine JSON and human Markdown:
- JSON: full diff, verdict, hash-chained ledger entry
- Markdown: formatted report with clause table and ledger hash
This is not a model evaluation (metric benchmark) system, and it is not a model-card registry. It tracks only whether a deployed AI system's runtime attributes have drifted from an approved policy baseline.
Generated by the recreate methodology from the recreate_prj corpus (run 003-policy-drift-dossier).
MIT — see LICENSE.
Jung Wook Yang (양정욱) · GitHub @sadpig70
