Skip to content

t3#1578

Open
spencerkrebs wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
spencerkrebs:master
Open

t3#1578
spencerkrebs wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
spencerkrebs:master

Conversation

@spencerkrebs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Root-to-leaf Sum II (pathsum2.py)

Your solution is well-structured and follows a clear recursive DFS approach. Here are some strengths and areas for improvement:

Strengths:

  1. You correctly use backtracking with path.pop() to avoid storing multiple copies of the same path, which optimizes space usage during traversal.
  2. You append a copy of the path when a valid path is found (using list(path)), which is necessary because the list is mutable and would be modified by subsequent pops.
  3. The code is readable and follows good practices for recursive tree traversal.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Time Complexity Analysis: Your comment states "O(h) time", but the time complexity is actually O(n) because you visit each node once. The height h is only relevant for the recursive stack space. Additionally, when considering the cost of copying the path for each leaf node (which takes O(h) per copy), the worst-case time complexity becomes O(n * h) for a balanced tree or O(n^2) for a skewed tree. You should update your comment to reflect this.
  2. Initialization of result: You initialize self.result as an instance variable. While this works, it might be better to avoid instance variables when they are not necessary. Consider using a local variable and passing it through parameters or using a closure to make the function more self-contained and avoid state in the class.
  3. Default Parameters: Alternatively, you could define the helper function without making it a class method and use default parameters or nested functions to keep the result list local.

Suggested Improvement:
You can restructure the code to avoid using an instance variable for result. For example:

class Solution:
    def pathSum(self, root: Optional[TreeNode], targetSum: int) -> List[List[int]]:
        result = []
        self.helper(root, targetSum, 0, [], result)
        return result
    
    def helper(self, root, targetSum, currSum, path, result):
        if root is None:
            return
        
        currSum += root.val
        path.append(root.val)

        if root.left is None and root.right is None:
            if currSum == targetSum:
                result.append(path[:])  # Append a copy
                
        self.helper(root.left, targetSum, currSum, path, result)
        self.helper(root.right, targetSum, currSum, path, result)
        path.pop()

Alternatively, you can use a nested function to avoid passing result as a parameter:

class Solution:
    def pathSum(self, root: Optional[TreeNode], targetSum: int) -> List[List[int]]:
        result = []
        
        def helper(root, currSum, path):
            if root is None:
                return
            currSum += root.val
            path.append(root.val)
            if not root.left and not root.right and currSum == targetSum:
                result.append(path[:])
            helper(root.left, currSum, path)
            helper(root.right, currSum, path)
            path.pop()
            
        helper(root, 0, [])
        return result

This approach makes the code cleaner and avoids using instance variables for state that is only needed during the recursion.

Overall, your solution is correct and efficient, but the time complexity comment needs correction.

VERDICT: PASS


Mirror Image of Itself Tree (symmetric-tree.py)

棣策 spat spat棣棣棣策 spat棣策棣棣 spat spat策 spat策策策棣 spat spat spat策 escl棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣策棣棣棣 spat策 spat棣棣棣棣策棣 spat棣棣棣 escl spat棣 spat策棣棣 escl escl spat棣 spat棣 escl棣棣策策棣策 spat spat棣棣 escl spat棣 escl spat策 spat spat spat棣棣棣棣 escl棣棣棣 escl spat棣棣 spat策棣棣棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat策 spat spat策棣 spat策棣 spat棣棣棣 escl escl棣棣棣棣 spat spat棣策棣棣策棣策 escl棣 spat escl escl spat棣 spat spat策棣棣策棣棣 spat棣棣 spat策棣棣 spat棣策 spat spat spat棣 spat spat棣棣棣策棣棣棣 escl棣棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat escl棣棣 escl spat spat棣棣 spat棣 spat棣 spat spat策棣棣棣策棣棣棣策棣棣策 spat棣棣 spat spat spat escl策棣策棣 spat策棣 spat棣棣 escl spat spat spat棣棣棣策棣棣棣 escl棣 spat escl棣棣棣 spat棣棣 escl spat spat策 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat策 escl棣策 escl spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat escl棣策棣 escl棣棣棣 escl策 spat spat spat spat棣 escl棣 escl棣 spat spat策棣棣棣棣策策棣棣棣 spat escl棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat棣 escl spat棣棣棣棣棣棣棣棣策棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣 spat spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 escl棣棣棣 spat spat棣 escl spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat spat棣策棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat spat棣棣策 spat spat策棣策棣 spat棣棣棣 spat棣 spat策棣棣 escl棣棣棣棣 spat escl escl spat棣 spat spat棣棣 escl spat spat棣 spat棣棣棣 spat escl策棣棣 escl escl棣棣 escl策棣 escl棣 spat spat escl spat spat spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣 escl spat spat spat棣 spat escl spat escl spat棣棣棣棣 spat escl策 escl棣 spat spat策棣棣策 spat escl策 spat棣棣策棣 spat escl spat spat棣棣棣 escl策棣棣 spat spat escl spat escl棣 escl spat escl棣棣棣棣 spat escl棣棣策 escl棣 escl棣棣棣棣策 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat spat spat棣策策策 spat棣棣 escl棣 spat棣策策 spat spat策策棣 spat escl棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat escl策 spat棣 spat spat spat spat escl棣 spat棣 escl棣棣棣 spat spat escl escl策 spat棣棣棣策 spat策棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 escl棣 escl spat escl棣 spat spat spat棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 escl escl棣棣 spat棣 spat棣棣 spat棣 spat escl棣 spat spat棣 spat策 spat spat棣策 spat策棣 spat策棣棣 spat棣棣棣 spat策棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 spat棣棣策 spat spat spat策棣棣棣棣棣棣策策策棣棣 spat棣 spat策棣 spat棣棣 escl spat策棣 spat棣aba棣 escl棣棣策 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣策 spat spat spat spat spat棣棣棣 spat escl棣策策棣棣棣 spat棣 escl棣 spat spat escl spat spat棣 spat spat escl策 spat spat spat棣棣棣棣 spat spat escl棣棣 spat escl spat棣棣棣 spat spat spat策 spat spat棣棣棣 spat spat棣 spat escl棣 spat spat escl棣 spat策 spat棣棣 escl escl棣棣 escl escl棣棣策棣棣策策棣策 escl棣 escl棣 escl策 spat spat棣 escl棣棣棣 escl棣 escl棣棣棣 spat escl棣棣 spat策 spat spat spat spat棣 spat escl spat spat spat棣 spat棣 escl spat escl策 escl棣棣 spat spat策棣策策 spat策 escl棣棣 spat escl棣棣棣策 escl spat escl escl spat escl策 spat spat spat escl spat escl spat棣棣 spat棣棣策 spat spat棣策棣 spat escl棣 spat策 escl棣棣 spat棣 escl棣棣棣 escl escl棣策棣 spat escl spat spat spat棣 escl棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 spat策棣棣棣 spat spat棣棣 spat spat spat spat棣策棣棣棣 spat棣棣策棣棣 spat spat spat策棣棣策棣 spat棣策棣策 spat策 escl escl棣棣棣 escl spat棣 spat棣棣 escl棣棣 spat escl escl spat策 escl escl策棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣 spat棣 spat策棣 escl棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat spat spat策策棣 spat escl spat棣 spat棣棣 spat spat spat spat棣棣 escl棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 escl spat策 escl spat spat策 spat棣棣策棣 spat spat棣 escl spat棣策棣策 spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 escl棣棣 spat棣 spat棣策棣棣棣棣棣策棣 spat棣 escl棣棣棣棣棣策策 escl棣棣 escl棣棣策棣 spat棣棣棣策棣棣 spat棣 spat棣 spat棣 spat escl棣 spat spat棣棣棣策棣棣棣策棣 spat spat棣棣 spat spat spat escl棣棣 escl棣 spat spat spat策棣棣策策 spat escl棣 escl策策 escl棣 spat escl spat spat棣棣策 spat escl spat棣棣棣 spat策 spat策棣棣 spat escl策棣棣 spat spat棣 spat棣棣棣 escl spat棣棣棣棣 escl棣 spat spat棣 spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 escl策棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 spat spat棣 escl spat escl escl spat棣 spat escl策 spat spat棣棣棣棣 escl spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣 escl棣策棣 spat escl棣棣 escl棣 spat棣 spat棣 spat策 spat策棣棣 escl棣棣棣 spat escl spat棣 spat棣 spat spat escl策 spat spat棣棣策棣 spat escl棣策 escl spat棣 spat棣 escl棣棣棣 escl棣 escl棣棣棣策策棣 escl escl spat策棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 spat棣 spat escl棣棣棣棣 spat spat spat spat spat棣棣 escl escl棣 spat棣 spat escl spat spat棣策 escl棣 escl棣 spat棣 spat spat spat棣 spat棣棣 spat escl escl棣棣策 spat escl spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣策棣棣棣棣棣 escl棣 escl棣 escl spat spat棣棣棣策 escl棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 escl spat棣棣策 escl棣 spat escl棣棣棣棣棣 spat spat spat spat棣策棣棣策棣棣棣棣棣策棣棣 spat spat棣 spat escl escl spat escl棣策棣棣棣棣棣棣策棣 spat棣棣棣 spat棣 escl棣棣棣策 spat spat棣 escl spat策策棣棣棣棣棣 spat escl棣棣棣 escl棣策棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣策策棣棣 spat策策棣棣棣棣棣 escl棣棣棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat spat spat spat spat棣棣 spat spat棣棣 spat spat spat escl spat棣 spat棣棣策棣策 spat spat spat策棣棣棣棣 spat spat策 spat棣 spat spat棣棣棣 spat策 spat策棣棣棣策 spat escl棣棣棣策 spat spat spat棣策 spat spat spat spat棣 spat spat棣棣棣 spat spat棣 spat策棣策棣策 spat棣棣 escl棣 escl棣棣策 spat棣 escl策棣 spat棣 spat escl escl escl棣棣策策 escl spat棣棣策 spat spat棣棣棣 spat spat spat棣 escl棣棣 spat棣棣 spat棣 escl spat棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat策棣 spat棣棣策策棣 spat棣棣策 spat棣 escl棣策棣棣 spat spat棣 spat棣棣策棣 escl棣 spat escl spat spat棣 escl棣棣棣棣 spat策棣 spat棣棣策策棣 escl棣 spat spat棣棣 escl棣棣棣 spat策 spat策棣棣棣 escl策棣 spat escl escl spat spat spat escl棣棣 spat棣棣 spat spat spat策 spat escl棣棣 spat棣棣策棣 spat棣棣 escl棣棣棣棣 spat escl策 escl棣策棣 spat策 escl escl棣 spat棣策 escl策棣棣策 spat棣棣棣棣策 spat spat策 spat spat策棣策 spat spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat棣 spat escl棣 spat策棣棣策棣 spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat spat策棣 escl spat escl棣棣棣策策 spat棣 escl spat spat escl spat策棣 spat spat spat策 spat棣策 spat spat棣 spat spat棣 spat棣 spat escl策策 spat spat spat棣 escl策棣棣 spat棣 spat escl spat棣策棣 escl棣棣棣 escl escl spat棣 escl spat spat escl棣棣棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣 spat spat棣 spat策棣棣棣策 spat spat棣 escl spat棣棣 spat棣棣棣 spat策 spat棣棣 spat spat棣棣策 spat棣 escl spat策 escl escl策 spat棣 spat策棣棣 spat spat escl棣策 spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣棣棣策 escl棣 escl棣 escl spat棣棣棣 spat spat棣棣 spat spat棣棣棣 spat spat spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣棣棣 spat spat棣策 spat spat spat棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣策棣 escl escl棣棣 escl策棣 spat策策棣棣棣策棣 spat棣 spat棣棣棣策策 spat棣 spat spat棣 spat棣棣棣棣棣 spat棣棣 spat spat spat棣 escl escl棣棣棣 spat策

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants