coinbase-smartcontracts

[Dargon789]

hardhat foundry toolchain ethereum test

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
coinbase-ethereum-smartcontracts	Ready	Preview, Comment	Dec 19, 2025 6:41pm
coinbase-smartcontracts	Ready	Preview, Comment	Dec 19, 2025 6:41pm

[sourcery-ai]

Sorry @Dargon789, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.

Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the development environment for smart contracts by refactoring the Hardhat configuration to integrate hardhat-rocketh for more efficient network and forking management. It also includes an update to the vitest testing dependency and minor code style adjustments in test utilities and a Solidity NatSpec comment.

Highlights

• Hardhat Configuration Streamlining: The hardhat.config.cjs file has been significantly refactored to utilize hardhat-rocketh for managing network and forking configurations, simplifying the overall setup.
• Dependency Update: The vitest testing framework has been updated to version 1.6.0 in package.json.
• NatSpec Comment Adjustment: A minor textual change was made in a NatSpec comment within src/GreetingsRegistry/GreetingsRegistry.sol.
• Test Utility Refinement: A stylistic change was applied to how the deployer variable is destructured in test/utils/index.ts.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request primarily refactors the Hardhat configuration to use the hardhat-rocketh library, which simplifies the setup for networks and forking. This is a good improvement for maintainability. I've found a minor typo in a Solidity contract comment that should be corrected. Otherwise, the changes look good.