Skip to content

Conversation

@ltfschoen
Copy link

@ltfschoen ltfschoen commented Jun 9, 2021

isDisabled: true,
text: t('rpc.test.datahighway.spreehafen', 'Spreehafen', { ns: 'apps-config' }),
providers: {
MXC: 'wss://spreehafen.datahighway.com'
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to find out the relevance of this being MXC or DataHighway

info: 'datahighway-harbour',
text: t('rpc.test.datahighway-harbour', 'DataHighway Harbour', { ns: 'apps-config' }),
info: 'datahighway-harbour-chain-testnet',
text: t('rpc.test.datahighway.harbour', 'DataHighway Harbour', { ns: 'apps-config' }),
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from a maintenance perspective, it might be easier if this was named datahighway-harbour instead of datahighway.harbour since find/replace would be quicker. what do you think?
(same applies to datahighway.spreehafen and datahighway.westlake)

['DataHighwayChain', nodeWestlake],
['DataHighway Node', nodeDataHighway],
['DataHighway Parachain Collator', nodeDataHighway],
['DataHighway', nodeDataHighwayDefault], // TODO - deprecated?
Copy link
Author

@ltfschoen ltfschoen Jun 9, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should remove all lines that i've labelled // TODO - deprecated? if they're not used anymore

minmax: [0, undefined],
types: {
Date: 'i64',
AccountInfo: "AccountInfoWithDualRefCount",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried adding and removing this. App works without it due to recent changes. Let me reverify this.

@ayushmishra2005 ayushmishra2005 self-requested a review June 10, 2021 12:43
Copy link

@ayushmishra2005 ayushmishra2005 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ltfschoen I am merging this. I will test and make corrections in my branch.

@ltfschoen
Copy link
Author

@ltfschoen I am merging this. I will test and make corrections in my branch.

the CI tests are failing for some reason, so we need to resolve that first

@ltfschoen
Copy link
Author

@ltfschoen I am merging this. I will test and make corrections in my branch.

the CI tests are failing for some reason, so we need to resolve that first

i just pushed a commit to see if that fixes it, will wait for CI to test again

@ayushmishra2005
Copy link

@ltfschoen I am merging this. I will test and make corrections in my branch.

the CI tests are failing for some reason, so we need to resolve that first

i just pushed a commit to see if that fixes it, will wait for CI to test again

sure

@ltfschoen
Copy link
Author

@ltfschoen I am merging this. I will test and make corrections in my branch.

the CI tests are failing for some reason, so we need to resolve that first

i just pushed a commit to see if that fixes it, will wait for CI to test again

i'm not familiar with why we're getting "Semgrep / check (pull_request) Failing", perhaps that's setup for PRs into polkadot-js/apps instead of our fork of it, so it may not matter if it doesn't pass until we change the PR target to polkadot-js/apps instead

@ayushmishra2005 ayushmishra2005 merged commit bb0f817 into Add_DataHighway_Harbour_testnet Jun 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants