Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #178 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 49.44% 49.42% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 86 86
Lines 7326 7328 +2
Branches 1268 1267 -1
==========================================
Hits 3622 3622
- Misses 3251 3253 +2
Partials 453 453
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
mnurisso
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
changelog is missing but PR seems ready
|
@mcadau @jhardenberg I realized it should be possible to revert the call in the |
|
Made some tests, with both 2 and 6 months of data (so still not enough to allow the diagnostic run so far). In addition, I confirm that in the current I also tested 12 months of data with this branch and no #159 errors occurred. So yes, you're right, and this change solves both issues. If you agree we can merge. |
|
That's great! Thanks for testing... perhaps you can port this to the v0.19-operational (in AQUA?)? So that we can test it extensively in the next days and if everything is as we like it we can merge both! |
|
Yes no problem! |
|
Since #2761 worked fine and tests were good on the operational as well, we can merge it also for main |
PR description:
This addresses #168 by correctly propagating the selection at the retrieve level.