Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline#3543
Merged
samsrabin merged 13 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom Jan 19, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…te_gdd20_baseline().
slevis-lmwg
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2026
Contributor
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samsrabin thank you for going over this work with me.
slevis-lmwg
added a commit
to slevis-lmwg/ctsm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR ESCOMP#3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR ESCOMP#3647 by Erik Kluzek; ESCOMP#3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR ESCOMP#3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR ESCOMP#3699
slevis-lmwg
added a commit
to slevis-lmwg/ctsm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR ESCOMP#3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR ESCOMP#3647 by Erik Kluzek; ESCOMP#3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR ESCOMP#3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR ESCOMP#3699
glemieux
added a commit
to glemieux/ctsm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR ESCOMP#3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR ESCOMP#3647 by Erik Kluzek; ESCOMP#3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR ESCOMP#3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR ESCOMP#3699
ekluzek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2026
Merge b4b-dev to master - Change some _U and _R history fields to be on by default PR #3667 by Keith Oleson - Update to cime version that fixes the check_input_data --download issue PR #3647 by Erik Kluzek; #3647 updated to cime6.1.145, while updating b4b-dev to master in this PR gets us to cime6.1.146. - Initial fixes to generate_gdd20_baseline PR #3543 - Decomp mod unittest PR #3699
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Some Python changes needed to get the
generate_gdd20_baselinescript working, along with some tests to prevent those exact problems from happening again. We should also add a SystemTest, but I've filed that as a separate issue: #3542.Note that more changes are coming. This PR is the first of several that will bring this script and related scripts up to date with the versions I used during the crop reparameterization, which have a complete set of fixes.
Note to reviewer: It'd probably be best to walk through the commits one-by-one.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: None
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #): None
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No
Testing performed, if any:
I've listed expectations for these suites, but if any fail, I will add them to the expected failure list. This is acceptable because I have more PRs to come in this series that will eventually fix the tests, if needed.
clm_pymodssuite completes successfully (diffs okay in tests exercising affected scripts but none occurred). No unexpected failures.rxcropmaturitysuite completes successfully (no baseline for comparison). No unexpected failures.