Skip to content

Conversation

@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor

@mdneyazahmad mdneyazahmad commented Nov 30, 2025

Explanation of Change

When we swipe between tab navigator, gesture animation triggers. If we try to navigate to different screen during this transition time. This creates a broken animation. We disable the swipe gesture to fix the issue.

Note: #76343 (comment) Swipe on tab navigator is not disabled only for the first time on iOS. This is related to a bug in the package react-native-pager-view. It was decided to handle this case in a separate issue here

Fixed Issues

$ #74735
PROPOSAL: #74735 (comment)

Tests

Screens

  1. FAB menu -> Create expense
  2. FAB menu -> Track distance
  3. FAB menu -> Start chat
  4. Select a report -> Split expense
  5. Workspaces -> Select a workspace -> Receipt partners -> Manage invites
  6. Goto gallery -> Pick an image -> Share -> Expensify (iOS/Android)

For the above screens, perform the following steps

  1. Switch between tabs
  2. Verify that there is no swipe gesture support for screen transition.
  3. Verify that it works as normal with click / tap.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

Same as test

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios-native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
macos-chrome.mp4

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/libs/Navigation/OnyxTabNavigator.tsx 86.48% <ø> (-0.36%) ⬇️
src/pages/NewChatSelectorPage.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/iou/request/IOURequestStartPage.tsx 86.30% <ø> (-0.19%) ⬇️
... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif I was able to test the usage of component on different pages, but I was not able to test for these two. Could you help me test these.

<TabScreenWithFocusTrapWrapper>

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@mdneyazahmad

per diem:

Screen.Recording.2025-12-02.at.10.17.57.pm.mov

receipt partner:

Screen.Recording.2025-12-02.at.10.19.07.pm.mov

You should connect uber to see invite page

@mdneyazahmad mdneyazahmad marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 06:54
@mdneyazahmad mdneyazahmad requested review from a team as code owners December 4, 2025 06:54
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from aimane-chnaif December 4, 2025 06:55
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from trjExpensify and removed request for a team December 4, 2025 06:55
@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif I indeed move to features screen. The feature is locked behind a subscription.

Screenshot 2025-12-04 at 12 24 49 PM

Meanwhile, I open the pr for review.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif I indeed move to features screen. The feature is locked behind a subscription.

You can upgrade.

Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess I'm a little confused. On the Create expense > Scan screen why would swiping not close the modal vs switch to the manual tab? 🤔

CC: @Expensify/design

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I'm confused too—I'm having a hard time understanding this issue in general. Would someone mind giving me a dumbed-down explanation? 🙏

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify @dannymcclain

swipe gesture is enabled on web too. you can try using mouse long click.
The bug happens while swiping between tabs,

Screen.Recording.2025-12-04.at.3.58.05.pm.mov

In this video, select currency button doesn't go to currency selection page correctly.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Ah ok I see now. 👍 Thanks for explaining!

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I guess I have two questions:

  1. Why do we have a swipe gesture on web for the tabs? Seems redundant. Also inconsistent because "swiping" on the manual tab doesn't close the RHP modal as it would on mobile.
  2. On mobile, do we really think swiping should change tabs? I see on staging it does not, and I think that's expected personally.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Why do we have a swipe gesture on web for the tabs?

Yeah I agree this seems like pretty pointless functionality.

On mobile, do we really think swiping should change tabs? I see on staging it does not, and I think that's expected personally.

TBH I've always had mixed feelings about this behavior as well. Swiping does change tabs for me, but if we're talking about removing that functionality, I think we need broader team input.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

On mobile, do we really think swiping should change tabs? I see on staging it does not, and I think that's expected personally.

Tested iOS. Swipe works

Screen.Recording.2025-12-04.at.4.15.59.pm.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-12-04.at.4.16.42.pm.mov

if we're talking about removing that functionality, I think we need broader team input.

👍

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Alright, I killed the app completely and now it works on Create expense. 🤷

It kinda' works on Track distance, but only from the Manual screen as on the map screen it scrolls the interactive map and does nothing over the start/stop rows.

Anyway, fine to leave it.. just seems a bit overkill.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, my issue with it is it's kinda unpredictable since different screens have different interactive components on them (like the map you pointed out). I'm not against ditching the swipe behavior, because I agree, I don't see it as being super necessary. I just don't want to make a casual decision in a PR and have a bunch of people upset because we changed it without telling anyone 😂

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif do you have any idea where we introduced this in the first place? It might be good to follow the history to see what discussion it came from.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure about web behavior but for mobile, I think the recent discussion happened in #65746 (comment). (please read through history from this comment)
@dannymcclain you were involved as well.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Oh nice, and I'm not even contradicting myself! 😂 Seems like the design team is aligned on just removing the swipe to change tabs altogether.

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Haha, nice! I mean, like in the git history, can we trace it back to where we implemented swipe to change tab, Aimane?

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Haha, nice! I mean, like in the git history, can we trace it back to where we implemented swipe to change tab, Aimane?

I thought the swipe was a default behavior of these TabView controllers with React Native/React Navigation? Also all for removing it. We had to disable it for MultiScan anyways since we had multiple swipe areas.

@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@mdneyazahmad please merge main and fix lint errors

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

I am still able to swipe on iOS (only first time)

ios.mov

@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif the bug is related to react-native-pager-view. The maintainer has published a new version (v7.0.2) which fixes the issue. Ideally upgrading react-native-pager-view in our project should fix it. I tried to update it on my system, but it is taking a lot of time to build the app, and it fails with some errors. Could you try do the same, and let me know whether it work after the fix.

callstack/react-native-pager-view#1043

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Good findings!

@Valforte regarding this iOS specific bug, should we fix here or handle as separate bug? The root cause is in upstream and seems fixed in react-native-pager-view 7.0.2
The current version is 6.9.1 (the major version was bumped)

"react-native-pager-view": "6.9.1",

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving to request review from @Valforte and see above comment

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Valforte December 12, 2025 19:57
@Valforte
Copy link
Contributor

Let's move forward with the fix as-is and leave the version bump for a new issue as that might have unintended consequences

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mchrome.mov
iOS: HybridApp
ios-bug.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Dec 15, 2025

Let's move forward with the fix as-is and leave the version bump for a new issue as that might have unintended consequences

@Valforte ok then we're good to merge.

@Valforte Valforte merged commit f302e6f into Expensify:main Dec 17, 2025
31 of 32 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@lanitochka17
Copy link

This PR is failing because of issue ##78051

The issue is reproducible in: IOS

Bug7033178_1766088932190.20251219_041309.1.mp4

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.2.82-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@mdneyazahmad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lanitochka17 aimane-chnaif has identified this issue here. Valforte has decided to continue with the pr, and handle the update in a new issue. I have added a note on this PR description for the context about this iOS swipe issue.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Valforte in version: 9.2.84-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.84-8 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants