Upgrade invitations service (Pydantic v2)

[giancarloromeo]

What do these changes do?

Upgrade the invitation service (Pydantic v2).

Related issue/s

• resolves Major upgrade to pydantic 2.0 #4481

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[giancarloromeo]

Using the alias_generator removes the need of the code above.

[pcrespov]

The implementation you did of _to_initial has the risk of producing inadvertently duplicate aliases as we extend the number of fields. An explicit mapping, as we have now, makes a mistake more obvious but I would also add an assert in the code.

I propose to either do an explicit map as an implementation or your first-letter implementation of _to_initial generator but in both cases make sure that there are no repetitions as

assert not [item for item, count in Counter([field.alias for field in _ContentWithShortNames.__fields__.values()]).items() if count > 1]  #nosec

[giancarloromeo]

I added the assert statement as test to catch alias repetition early and have a clean separation between validation and model logic.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.95652% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (pydantic_v2_migration@1d92881). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...common-library/src/common_library/serialization.py	50.0%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...s/models-library/src/models_library/invitations.py	0.0%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             pydantic_v2_migration   #6513   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                         ?   78.5%           
=======================================================
  Files                            ?     304           
  Lines                            ?   11834           
  Branches                         ?     880           
=======================================================
  Hits                             ?    9301           
  Misses                           ?    2410           
  Partials                         ?     123           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	78.5% <86.9%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...rc/simcore_service_invitations/api/_invitations.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...tions/src/simcore_service_invitations/api/_meta.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...invitations/src/simcore_service_invitations/cli.py	92.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...s/src/simcore_service_invitations/core/settings.py	97.2% <100.0%> (ø)
...imcore_service_invitations/services/invitations.py	97.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...s/models-library/src/models_library/invitations.py	73.0% <0.0%> (ø)
...common-library/src/common_library/serialization.py	58.3% <50.0%> (ø)

[pcrespov]

🎉

[pcrespov]

thx. Please check the alias generator

[pcrespov]

thx

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud