-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Upgrade invitations service (Pydantic v2) #6513
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
giancarloromeo
merged 15 commits into
ITISFoundation:pydantic_v2_migration
from
giancarloromeo:is4481/upgrade-invitations
Oct 11, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5d76e4d
upgrade reqs
giancarloromeo cafb49f
fix code
giancarloromeo c141118
fix mypy
giancarloromeo 8e49f76
fix mypy
giancarloromeo 90f4556
fix model copy
giancarloromeo 204ecf3
fix deprecated dict
giancarloromeo f70fa05
fix deprecated method
giancarloromeo d781534
fix url type
giancarloromeo 676e65e
make openapi.json
giancarloromeo 998585d
fix url
giancarloromeo bbd7485
fix guest email strategy
giancarloromeo 3962f85
fix import
giancarloromeo 15349dd
fix Url serialization
giancarloromeo 2d79cb0
fix url
giancarloromeo 7ad1a1d
add aliases uniqueness test
giancarloromeo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using the
alias_generatorremoves the need of the code above.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The implementation you did of
_to_initialhas the risk of producing inadvertently duplicate aliases as we extend the number of fields. An explicit mapping, as we have now, makes a mistake more obvious but I would also add anassertin the code.I propose to either do an explicit map as an implementation or your first-letter implementation of
_to_initialgenerator but in both cases make sure that there are no repetitions asThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the
assertstatement as test to catch alias repetition early and have a clean separation between validation and model logic.