-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
test: use ParallelTestRunner.jl #277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #277 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 56.43% 56.43%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 1212 1212
=======================================
Hits 684 684
Misses 528 528
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
I'm moving the non-ParallelTestRunner bits of this PR over to #280. Will update once that's completed |
|
Ok, I think things are looking ok here, and with a decent speedup. I tried updating the PR title and top-level comment to follow the conventional commits style. Happy to make any changes! |
Use ParallelTestRunner.jl for subpackage tests. Tests are refactored into their own files to leverage parallelization. Below are the relevant speedups in CI:
Note: Times in
mainare from #280 to make comparisons more apples-to-apples. Can update once merged.