Skip to content

Conversation

@Zentrik
Copy link
Contributor

@Zentrik Zentrik commented Feb 10, 2025

No description provided.

@Zentrik Zentrik enabled auto-merge (squash) February 10, 2025 22:04
@giordano
Copy link
Member

ERROR: LoadError: ArgumentError: Platform `riscv64-linux-gnu-libgfortran5-cxx11-llvm_version+19` is not an officially supported platform
Stacktrace:
 [1] parse(::Type{Platform}, triplet::String; validate_strict::Bool)
   @ Base.BinaryPlatforms ./binaryplatforms.jl:746
 [2] parse(::Type{Platform}, triplet::String)
   @ Base.BinaryPlatforms ./binaryplatforms.jl:659
 [3] top-level scope
   @ /cache/julia-buildkite-plugin/depots/e2fd9734-29d8-45cd-b0eb-59f7104f3131/packages/libLLVM_jll/GP14s/.pkg/select_artifacts.jl:11
 [4] include(fname::String)
   @ Base.MainInclude ./client.jl:451

Sigh.

@giordano
Copy link
Member

@giordano
Copy link
Member

I'd suggest skipping riscv64 for this round, we'll look into this later. It'd need regenerating llvm_full anyway, can't do anything about this right now.

@giordano
Copy link
Member

giordano commented Feb 10, 2025

I temporarily cancelled the jobs to do some maintenance on the build machine, will restart when done

Update: in the end I solved the issue by making a PR, I restarted the jobs here.

@giordano
Copy link
Member

giordano commented Feb 11, 2025

I opened JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilder.jl#1366 about what's needed to fix the riscv64 issue.

@Zentrik Zentrik merged commit 4fd4f1b into JuliaPackaging:master Feb 11, 2025
127 checks passed
end

platforms = supported_platforms(; experimental=experimental_platforms)
filter!(p->arch(p)!="riscv64", platforms) # Not supported yet, see https://github.com/JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilder.jl/issues/1366
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the record, this should be fixed now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, removed in #10594

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants