Skip to content

Conversation

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Fixed print statements to be more clear that the test failed due to mainly grind time not reaching the threshold.

expected output at failure.
image

@Malmahrouqi3 Malmahrouqi3 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2025 19:02
@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Malmahrouqi3 commented Jun 20, 2025

All failure modes: zero, negative, null, below thresholds.

 Comparing Benchmarks: Speedups from master/bench-cpu.yaml to pr/bench-cpu.yaml are displayed below. Thus, numbers > 1 represent increases in performance.
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Error: Benchmarking failed since grind time speedup for simulation below acceptable threshold (<0.95) - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: 5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: hypo_hll
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for simulation is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Error: Benchmarking failed since grind time speedup for simulation below acceptable threshold (<0.95) - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic
 Warning: Exec time speedup for pre_process is less than 0.9 - Case: ibm
 Warning: Exec time speedup for post_process is less than 0.9 - Case: ibm

  Case                         Pre Process                  Simulation   Post Process
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
  5eq_rk3_weno3_hllc            Exec: 0.95   Exec: -0.00 & Grind: 0.00     Exec: 0.84
  hypo_hll                      Exec: 0.75                  Exec: 0.84     Exec: 0.21
  viscous_weno5_sgb_acoustic    Exec: 0.86    Exec: 0.00 & Grind: 0.00     Exec: 0.77
  ibm                           Exec: 0.68                         N/A     Exec: 0.63



Error: Benchmarking failed

Terminated


sbryngelson
sbryngelson previously approved these changes Jun 20, 2025
@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

will merge once the benchmark CI passes

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sounds good

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 45.78%. Comparing base (59d0c09) to head (170cbe6).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #895   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.78%   45.78%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines       18658    18658           
  Branches     2251     2251           
=======================================
  Hits         8543     8543           
  Misses       8757     8757           
  Partials     1358     1358           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Benchmark / Phoenix gpu failed to build master oddly.

@Malmahrouqi3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Genuinely baffling, I can't see what could have triggered the failure. I will submit a manual benchmark job on Phoenix right now and share the results tonight.

@sbryngelson
Copy link
Member

Phoenix is having filesystem migration issues.

@sbryngelson sbryngelson self-requested a review June 21, 2025 01:16
@sbryngelson sbryngelson self-requested a review June 21, 2025 14:31
@sbryngelson sbryngelson merged commit 9c224ba into MFlowCode:master Jun 21, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
prathi-wind pushed a commit to prathi-wind/MFC-prathi that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants