Skip to content

Conversation

@DAlperin
Copy link
Member

@DAlperin DAlperin commented Dec 3, 2025

No password

no-password

Main with password

old-password

This PR with password

with-async-task

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@DAlperin DAlperin marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 22:04
@DAlperin DAlperin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2025 22:04
let hash = hash.clone();
let role_id = role.id;
let superuser = role.attributes.superuser.unwrap_or(false);
task::spawn(|| "auth-check-hash", async move {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder how results look if we use spawn_blocking instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants