Skip to content

Conversation

@ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

@ralfhandl ralfhandl commented Oct 21, 2024

Some minor copyedits that we spotted when reviewing around the time of the 1.0 release.

@ralfhandl ralfhandl added this to the Release 1.0 milestone Oct 21, 2024
mikekistler
mikekistler previously approved these changes Oct 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. 👍

@ralfhandl ralfhandl requested a review from a team October 22, 2024 06:58
@lornajane lornajane marked this pull request as draft October 22, 2024 15:24
@ralfhandl ralfhandl modified the milestones: Release 1.0, Release 2.0 Oct 22, 2024
@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

Two things here:

  • This should be in a future patch release, so 1.0.1 or something like that, we won't update the 1.0.0 spec contents now.
  • This repo needs a branching strategy and documentation to go with it, and then we'll rebase this PR and use it as a target demo.

@ralfhandl ralfhandl modified the milestones: Release 2.0, Release 1.0 Oct 22, 2024
@lornajane lornajane changed the title 1.0.0: the hopefully last two typos 1.x: the hopefully last two typos Oct 22, 2024
@ralfhandl ralfhandl changed the base branch from main to v1.0-dev March 11, 2025 10:34
@ralfhandl ralfhandl dismissed mikekistler’s stale review March 11, 2025 10:34

The base branch was changed.

@ralfhandl ralfhandl marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 10:35
@lornajane lornajane force-pushed the the-hopefully-last-typos branch from 9c033d7 to ad1586c Compare March 11, 2025 15:46
@lornajane lornajane requested a review from mikekistler March 11, 2025 15:47
Copy link
Contributor

@lornajane lornajane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First contributions to the 1.0.1 spec and they look good :)

@lornajane lornajane requested a review from a team March 11, 2025 15:48
@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

(be careful, I rebased it on the v1.0-dev branch to sort out some conflicts)

@ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lornajane @mikekistler Can this PR be merged?

@lornajane
Copy link
Contributor

It needs a second review but otherwise I think we're all set

Copy link
Contributor

@mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! 👍

@ralfhandl ralfhandl merged commit f8db8cf into OAI:v1.0-dev Aug 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@ralfhandl ralfhandl deleted the the-hopefully-last-typos branch August 12, 2025 19:32
ralfhandl added a commit to ralfhandl/Overlay-Specification that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
ralfhandl added a commit to ralfhandl/Overlay-Specification that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants