Skip to content

Fw arp/v2#2953

Closed
victorjulien wants to merge 2 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
victorjulien:fw-arp/v2
Closed

Fw arp/v2#2953
victorjulien wants to merge 2 commits intoOISF:masterfrom
victorjulien:fw-arp/v2

Conversation

@victorjulien
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ticket

If your pull request is related to a Suricata ticket, please provide
the full URL to the ticket here so this pull request can monitor
changes to the ticket status:

Redmine ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jufajardini jufajardini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe minor, but thinking about the coverage report, should we add tests that cover the ether and ports usage in a rule? (which should error out, from what I understood?)

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
alert arp any any -> any any (sid:1;)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we test that alert ip does not alert on ARP packets ?

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
alert ether any any -> any any (ether.hdr; content:"|08 06|"; offset:12; depth:2; sid:1;)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a ticket for the ether.type keyword ?

@victorjulien victorjulien marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2026 09:50
@victorjulien
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merged in #2998, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

requires suricata pr Depends on a PR in Suricata

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants