-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
OP-TED eForms-SDK Q-a Discussions
Sort by:
Latest activity
Categories, most helpful, and community links
Categories
Community links
🙏 Q&A Discussions
Ask the community for help
-
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Clean vehicles are not shown on the notice
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Confusing properties for BT-76-Lot
schematronsRelated to the Schematron validation (/schematrons SDK folder) -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Missing Mandatory Constraint for BT-14-Lot in Notice Type 7
fieldsRelated to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 The eformsSdkVersion has an invalid format, please respect the following format eforms-sdk-x.x SDK 1.9
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Strange Error in Address
validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 View-template 38
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BT-67 Type does not appear in notice PDF
view-templatesRelated to EFX view templates (/view-templates SDK folder). visualisationRelated to notice visualisation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Eform 17 - Error OPT-060-Lot
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 XML encoding
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 SDK 1.7.2?
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BT-702(b)-notice error validation using XPath
help wantedExtra attention is needed fieldsRelated to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) efx-toolkitRelated to the EFX Toolkit Java library validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 ELX does not work with DependencyFactory
efx-grammarRelated to the EFX grammar (syntax, concepts etc) efx-toolkitRelated to the EFX Toolkit Java library -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Question regarding new rule making field BT-746 "Winner Listed" mandatory for winners.
validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 mistype in rules: BT-1541-Contract
translationsAbout labels and translations -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 condition explanation
efx-grammarRelated to the EFX grammar (syntax, concepts etc) efx-toolkitRelated to the EFX Toolkit Java library validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 EFX rule conflict with BT-610-Procedure-Buyer and BT-10-Procedure Buyer on Notice Type 2
validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BT-1252 Direct Award Justification Previous Procedure Identifier - old procedure?
fieldsRelated to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) business termsClarifications on business terms -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BT-13721 indicator missing
fieldsRelated to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) business termsClarifications on business terms -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Rule "BR-BT-00262-0211" in SDK 1.9 does not implement article 13 of 2014/24/EU
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BT-778 (Framework Maximum Participants) is forgotten in the SDK?
fieldsRelated to field metadata (/fields/fields.json) -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 ERROR FROM CVS
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum. validationRelated to notice validation. -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Champs manquants dans le XML sur eNotices
off-topic > contact helpdeskThe subject of this discussion is out of the scope of this forum.