Account For Random Starting Items When Building Misc Hints

[jdunn596]

Fixes #2502

If you want it formatted differently or something let me know since I know \ is frowned upon

EDIT: Now using paren syntax

Testing

Monitored text output in debugger. Unable to test in-game due to the current compressor issue

[jdunn596]

Update: Tested both cases from the reported issue on PJ64 with the debug menu

[flagrama]

If you want it formatted differently or something let me know since I know \ is frowned upon

Using parenthesis around the condition is the way it is done (forced) in other languages

[jdunn596]

If you want it formatted differently or something let me know since I know \ is frowned upon

Using parenthesis around the condition is the way it is done (forced) in other languages

Yeah I had it wrapped in parenthesis originally but it just looked stupid to me 😂 can definitely change it back though

Edit: nvm I'm just gonna change it to the use paren

[fenhl]

Any reason to do it this way instead of just adding randomized_starting_items to effective_starting_items?

[jdunn596]

Any reason to do it this way instead of just adding randomized_starting_items to effective_starting_items?

I couldn't think of a clean way to address the conflicting data types. effective_starting_items is a dict of items and StarterRecord objects whereas randomized_starting_items contains the items and int values making the method of collection different which complicates things