Skip to content

Conversation

@Amxx
Copy link
Collaborator

@Amxx Amxx commented Nov 13, 2025

Unit tests for #6106 (that we should merge even if we end up rejecting #6106)

@Amxx Amxx requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2025 19:15
@Amxx Amxx added tests Test suite and helpers. ignore-changeset labels Nov 13, 2025
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 13, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 08d217f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The test file test/utils/RLP.test.js was updated to expand test coverage for RLP encoding. An import for the product helper was added to enable iterative testing. The encode/decode addresses test now iterates over multiple address variants instead of a single address. A new test was introduced that systematically tests RLP encoding predictions for contract creation addresses by generating pairs of from-addresses and nonce values, encoding them, hashing with keccak256, extracting the last 20 bytes, and verifying the results against the standard address prediction method.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add RLP library #5680: Introduced the RLP library that is being tested by the updated test file, so changes to RLP encoding tests directly correspond to testing the encoder behavior from this PR.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Test encoding of addresses with leading zeros' is related to the main change: adding tests for address encoding including cases with leading zeros, though it focuses on one aspect rather than the full scope which also includes a new create-address prediction test.
Description check ✅ Passed The description 'Unit tests for #6106' is related to the changeset as the PR adds unit tests for address encoding.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6308fdc and f437257.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/utils/RLP.test.js (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
test/utils/RLP.test.js (1)
test/helpers/random.js (1)
  • generators (3-10)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: slither
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: tests-foundry
  • GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: halmos
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/utils/RLP.test.js (1)

5-5: LGTM!

The import is correctly structured and necessary for the new test that uses the product helper.

Amxx and others added 3 commits November 14, 2025 10:12
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ignore-changeset tests Test suite and helpers.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant