feat(abr-testing): Changed 96ch lv protocol to include more partial tip steps #18395
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## edge #18395 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 26.26% 26.26%
=======================================
Files 3270 3270
Lines 280846 280846
Branches 32958 32958
=======================================
Hits 73776 73776
Misses 207041 207041
Partials 29 29
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
sfoster1
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2025
neo-jesse
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2025
…ip steps (#18395) <!-- Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing Guide: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams, pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub markdown, see: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out the sections below to the best of your ability! --> # Overview Changed Low Volume 96ch Protocol to Include more Partial Tip Steps ## Test Plan and Hands on Testing - ran in ABR ## Changelog - Changed ABR6 protocol to be a different protocol that includes more partial tip steps. This was changed because the protocol previously used was overly simple. - Removed unused protocols ## Review requests <!-- - What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to merge? - Ask questions. --> ## Risk assessment <!-- - Indicate the level of attention this PR needs. - Provide context to guide reviewers. - Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects. - Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your change may affect some other part of the system. - For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the behavior of labware calibration. - How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's risks and the risk of future regressions? - Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is enough. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Changed Low Volume 96ch Protocol to Include more Partial Tip Steps
Test Plan and Hands on Testing
Changelog
Review requests
Risk assessment