Skip to content

Conversation

@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Sep 17, 2024

Resolves #13965

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the versioning scheme to reflect the latest release for LinkedIn's API.
    • Incremented version numbers for various LinkedIn action components, indicating potential enhancements or bug fixes.
    • Streamlined the request handling process for improved clarity and functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured alignment with the new API version without affecting existing functionality.

@luancazarine luancazarine linked an issue Sep 17, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 20, 2024 2:03pm
pipedream ❌ Failed (Inspect) Sep 20, 2024 2:03pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 20, 2024 2:03pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 20, 2024 2:03pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the LinkedIn components, primarily focusing on version number increments across various modules and modifications to the API request construction logic. The changes include transitioning from object-based parameters to query string construction for API calls, enhancing pagination handling, and updating method signatures for clarity. These adjustments align the components with a new API release, ensuring compatibility and improved functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-access-control/get-organization-access-control.mjs, components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-administrators/get-organization-administrators.mjs Version updated from "0.1.4" to "0.1.5" and "0.2.4" to "0.2.5"; modified parameter construction logic to use query strings and manage pagination with a separate start variable.
components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs Updated HTTP request handling; replaced _makeRequest with _makeRequestAxios, changed method signature for getAccessControl, and updated mapping function return structure.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update the API version to resolve the bug (#13965)
Ensure components work with the new version (#13965) Unclear if testing has been conducted.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the meadow, a change so bright,
The version hops to a new height.
With query strings and pagination neat,
LinkedIn components can't be beat!
From "0.1.4" to "0.1.5" they soar,
Ready for use, and so much more! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

michelle0927
michelle0927 previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fa142b and 2eaca8d.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-access-control/get-organization-access-control.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-administrators/get-organization-administrators.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-access-control/get-organization-access-control.mjs
  • components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-administrators/get-organization-administrators.mjs
Additional comments not posted (2)
components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs (2)

49-49: Consistency in mapping option values

Mapping value to element.id ensures consistency with the expected option structure where value represents the internal identifier.


142-146: Verify the necessity of both _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods

The _makeRequest method overlaps in functionality with the new _makeRequestAxios method. Maintaining both methods may introduce redundancy and potential confusion. Verify if both are required, or if one can be refactored or removed to streamline the codebase.

Run the following script to identify usages of _makeRequest in the codebase:

Verification successful

Both _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods serve distinct purposes

After careful analysis, it appears that both _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods are necessary in the LinkedIn app:

  • _makeRequest is the primary method for making API requests, used extensively across various endpoints.
  • _makeRequestAxios seems to be a newer or specialized method, currently used for the getAccessControl functionality.

The methods have slight differences in implementation, suggesting they serve different use cases. Maintaining both allows for gradual migration or handling of specific scenarios.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all references to `_makeRequest` method in the codebase.

# Search for `_makeRequest` usages in JavaScript/TypeScript files.
rg --type js --type ts '_makeRequest\('

Length of output: 11113


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods in the LinkedIn app file

echo "Searching for _makeRequest:"
rg '_makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

echo -e "\nSearching for _makeRequestAxios:"
rg '_makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

Length of output: 856


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve implementations and usage context of _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods

echo "Implementation of _makeRequest:"
rg -A 10 'async _makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

echo -e "\nImplementation of _makeRequestAxios:"
rg -A 10 'async _makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

echo -e "\nUsage context of _makeRequest:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 'this._makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

echo -e "\nUsage context of _makeRequestAxios:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 'this._makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs

Length of output: 3567

@luancazarine luancazarine merged commit 34680f8 into master Sep 20, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@luancazarine luancazarine deleted the 13965-bug-linkedin-components-api-version-update branch September 20, 2024 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] LinkedIn components API version update

3 participants