TheMagicDrip new components #14265
TheMagicDrip new components #14265
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe changes primarily focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_campaigns/list_campaigns.mjs (1)
3-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The metadata for the "List Campaigns" action is comprehensive and follows best practices. The key, name, version, type, and props are all correctly set.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what campaigns are in the context of TheMagicDrip to the description. This would provide more context for users who might not be familiar with the concept.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_templates/list_templates.mjs (2)
3-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is comprehensive and follows good practices:
- The key, name, and description are clear and descriptive.
- Including the API documentation link in the description is helpful.
- The action type and props are correctly set.
Consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") for the initial release instead of "0.0.1", unless this is intentionally a pre-release version.
12-18: LGTM: Run method implementation is correct.The run method is well-implemented:
- It correctly uses the app instance to fetch templates.
- The summary export is clear and handles the case of no templates.
- The method returns the templates as expected.
Consider adding error handling to make the action more robust:
async run({ $ }) { + try { const { templates } = await this.app.listTemplates({ $, }); $.export("$summary", `Sucessfully retrieved ${templates?.length ?? 0} templates`); return templates; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve templates: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },This will provide more informative error messages and maintain consistent behavior with other actions.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_campaign_created/new_campaign_created.mjs (4)
13-16: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The
getItemsmethod correctly implements the campaign listing functionality. It's properly defined as async and uses the app'slistCampaignsmethod.Consider adding error handling to make the component more robust:
async getItems() { - const { campaigns } = await this.app.listCampaigns(); - return campaigns; + try { + const { campaigns } = await this.app.listCampaigns(); + return campaigns; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Error fetching campaigns:", error); + throw error; + } },
17-19: LGTM! Consider adding a null check for robustness.The
getItemIdmethod correctly returns theworkflowIdof the campaign, which is appropriate for deduplication.To enhance robustness, consider adding a null check:
getItemId(item) { - return item.workflowId; + if (!item || !item.workflowId) { + throw new Error("Invalid item: workflowId is missing"); + } + return item.workflowId; },This change will help prevent errors if an invalid item is passed to the method.
20-25: LGTM! Consider adding property checks for enhanced reliability.The
getItemMetadatamethod correctly constructs a metadata object with a clear summary and timestamp.To improve reliability, consider adding property checks:
getItemMetadata(item) { + if (!item || typeof item !== 'object') { + throw new Error("Invalid item: must be an object"); + } + if (!item.name || !item.createdAt) { + throw new Error("Invalid item: missing required properties"); + } return { summary: `New Campaign: ${item.name}`, ts: item.createdAt, }; },This change will help ensure that the method receives valid input and prevent potential runtime errors.
1-27: Overall, well-implemented component with room for minor enhancements.This new component successfully implements the source for new campaign creation events, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, follows good practices, and provides clear metadata.
Key strengths:
- Clear and informative metadata
- Proper implementation of required methods
- Alignment with the "List Campaigns" functionality
Suggestions for improvement:
- Add error handling in the
getItemsmethod- Implement null checks in
getItemIdandgetItemMetadatamethodsThese enhancements will improve the robustness and reliability of the component.
Consider implementing a common error handling strategy across all components to ensure consistent behavior and easier maintenance.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_template_created/new_template_created.mjs (3)
5-10: LGTM: Well-structured source configurationThe source configuration is complete and well-structured. The unique key, descriptive name, and link to documentation in the description are particularly helpful.
Consider implementing a versioning strategy for future updates. For example, you might want to use semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) for easier tracking of changes and compatibility.
11-16: LGTM: Proper implementation of getItems methodThe getItems method is correctly implemented using async/await and properly interacts with the app's listTemplates method. This aligns well with the "List Templates" objective from the PR.
Consider adding error handling to the getItems method. For example:
async getItems() { try { const { templates } = await this.app.listTemplates(); return templates; } catch (error) { console.error('Error fetching templates:', error); throw error; // or handle it as appropriate for your use case } }This will make the code more robust and easier to debug in case of API errors.
17-26: LGTM: Effective implementation of getItemId and getItemMetadataThe getItemId and getItemMetadata methods are well-implemented and provide the necessary functionality for identifying and summarizing new templates. This supports the "Polling Sources" objective for emitting events when new templates are created.
Consider adding input validation to these methods to handle potential edge cases. For example:
getItemId(item) { if (!item || typeof item !== 'object' || !item.templateId) { throw new Error('Invalid item: templateId is missing'); } return item.templateId; } getItemMetadata(item) { if (!item || typeof item !== 'object' || !item.name || !item.createdAt) { throw new Error('Invalid item: name or createdAt is missing'); } return { summary: `New Template: ${item.name}`, ts: item.createdAt, }; }This will make the code more robust and help catch potential issues early.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM: Well-structured metadata with minor suggestion.The metadata provides comprehensive information about the action. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is particularly helpful.
Consider replacing the
{{ts}}placeholder in the version with an actual version number or build identifier for better traceability.
23-38: LGTM: Well-implemented run method with suggestion for error handling.The
runmethod is well-structured and implements the action's logic effectively:
- It correctly uses the defined props.
- The asynchronous operation is handled properly.
- The summary message is dynamically generated based on the
activatevalue.Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
async run({ $ }) { const { campaignId, activate, } = this; - const response = await this.app.markCampaignActiveInactive({ - $, - campaignId, - activate, - }); + try { + const response = await this.app.markCampaignActiveInactive({ + $, + campaignId, + activate, + }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${activate - ? "" - : "de"}activated campaign`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${activate ? "" : "de"}activated campaign`); - return response; + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to ${activate ? "" : "de"}activate campaign: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },This change will provide more informative error messages and ensure that errors are properly propagated.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add_lead_to_campaign/add_lead_to_campaign.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata provides clear information about the action's purpose and identity. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is helpful for developers.
Consider using a more specific version number instead of "0.0.{{ts}}". This could help with tracking changes and maintaining backwards compatibility. For example, you could use "1.0.0" as the initial version.
9-52: LGTM: Props definition is comprehensive and flexible.The props definition aligns well with the action's purpose of adding a lead to a campaign. The use of
propDefinitionforcampaignIdand the optional nature of most fields provide flexibility in lead data. ThecustomVariablesprop allows for extensibility.Consider adding data validation for the
linkedInPublicUrlandcompanyLinkedInUrlprops to ensure they are valid URLs. You could use a regular expression or a custom validation function. For example:linkedInPublicUrl: { type: "string", label: "LinkedIn Public URL", description: "LinkedIn public URL of the lead", optional: true, validate: (url) => { const linkedInUrlRegex = /^https:\/\/[a-z]{2,3}\.linkedin\.com\/in\/[\w\-]+\/?$/i; if (!linkedInUrlRegex.test(url)) { throw new Error("Invalid LinkedIn URL format"); } }, },Apply similar validation to
companyLinkedInUrl.
53-71: LGTM: Run method implementation is concise and effective.The run method correctly uses async/await for the API call and efficiently destructures the input. It follows the single responsibility principle by focusing on adding a lead to a campaign. The export of a summary message provides useful feedback.
Consider adding error handling to provide more informative feedback in case of API failures. For example:
async run({ $ }) { const { app, campaignId, ...lead } = this; try { const response = await app.addLeadToCampaign({ $, campaignId, data: { leadsWithCustomVariables: [ lead, ], }, }); $.export( "$summary", `Successfully added lead "${lead.lastName}" to campaign`, ); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to add lead "${lead.lastName}" to campaign`); throw error; } }This will provide more context in case of an error and still throw the error for proper error handling upstream.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs (1)
27-28: Enhance the event summary for better clarity.The
summaryfield ingetItemMetadata()currently returns a static string"New event". Consider making the summary more descriptive by including information from theitem, such as its name or ID. This can help users quickly identify the nature of the event in logs.Here's an example modification:
return { - summary: "New event", + summary: `New event: ${item.name || this.getItemId(item)}`, ts: Date.now(), };components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (1)
39-46: Securely handle API key and avoid exposing sensitive informationEnsure that the API key is securely handled and not exposed in logs or error messages. Double-check that sensitive information is not inadvertently logged or included in responses.
[security]
Consider adding safeguards to prevent accidental exposure of the API key.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/add_lead_to_campaign/add_lead_to_campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_campaigns/list_campaigns.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_templates/list_templates.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/sources/common.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_campaign_created/new_campaign_created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_template_created/new_template_created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (20)
components/the_magic_drip/package.json (4)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate, reflecting the addition of new features and components as described in the PR objectives.
14-14: PublishConfig modification is correct.Setting the "access" property to "public" in publishConfig is appropriate for this Pipedream component, ensuring it will be publicly accessible when published to npm.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall, the package.json changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The version update, publishConfig modification, and addition of dependencies are all appropriate for the implementation of new TheMagicDrip components. Just ensure to verify the @pipedream/platform version as suggested earlier.
15-17: Dependencies addition looks good, but verify the version.The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is appropriate for this component. The version constraint "^3.0.3" allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
Please verify that 3.0.3 is the latest stable version of @pipedream/platform. You can check this by running:
If a newer stable version is available, consider updating to it.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_campaigns/list_campaigns.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the main app module for TheMagicDrip, which is essential for accessing the API methods.
1-19: Overall assessment: Well-implemented with minor improvements needed.This implementation of the "List Campaigns" action aligns well with the PR objectives. It correctly interacts with the TheMagicDrip app to retrieve campaigns. The code structure, naming conventions, and functionality are generally good.
The suggested improvements (error handling and typo fix) are minor and once addressed, this implementation will be robust and ready for use.
To ensure this action integrates well with the rest of the system, let's verify the app import and the listCampaigns method:
This script will help confirm that the necessary dependencies for this action are correctly implemented in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: The
listCampaignsmethod is correctly implemented as asynchronous incomponents/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the app import and listCampaigns method # Check if the app file exists fd -t f the_magic_drip.app.mjs # Check for the listCampaigns method in the app file rg -t js "listCampaigns.*=.*async" -A 5Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Confirm the exact definition of the listCampaigns method in the app file # Display the contents of the app file to manually inspect the listCampaigns method cat components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs # Search for any definition of listCampaigns, regardless of async keyword rg -t js "listCampaigns\s*\(" -A 10 components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjsLength of output: 2612
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list_templates/list_templates.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the app instance from the relative path. This follows good practices for modular code organization.
1-19: Overall implementation looks good and meets requirements.This "List Templates" action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides the required functionality to list available templates without needing extra properties beyond the application context.
Key strengths:
- Clear and descriptive metadata
- Proper use of the app instance for API interaction
- Concise and functional implementation
Consider the previously mentioned suggestions for versioning and error handling to further improve the robustness of this action.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_campaign_created/new_campaign_created.mjs (1)
1-10: LGTM! Well-structured object with clear metadata.The import statement and object structure are well-organized. The metadata properties provide clear information about the component, including a helpful link to the documentation. The version number is appropriate for a new component.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new_template_created/new_template_created.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM: Good use of common moduleThe import statement and the way the common module is spread into the exported object is a good practice. It promotes code reuse and maintains consistency across different components.
1-27: Overall assessment: Well-implemented new template creation sourceThis new module successfully implements a source for detecting new template creation events, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, leverages common functionality effectively, and implements the necessary methods for template listing and event emission.
Key strengths:
- Good use of a common module for shared functionality.
- Clear and descriptive source configuration.
- Proper implementation of required methods (getItems, getItemId, getItemMetadata).
Suggestions for improvement:
- Implement error handling in the getItems method.
- Add input validation to getItemId and getItemMetadata methods.
- Consider adopting a semantic versioning strategy for future updates.
These improvements will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code. Great job on implementing this new feature!
components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive/mark_campaign_active_or_inactive.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and follows best practices.The import statement is concise and correctly imports the necessary dependency.
9-22: LGTM: Props are well-defined and cover necessary inputs.The props definition is comprehensive:
- The
appprop ensures the action has access to the application instance.- The
campaignIdprop uses apropDefinition, promoting modularity and reusability.- The
activateprop is clearly defined with an informative label and description.This structure aligns well with the action's purpose of marking a campaign as active or inactive.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add_lead_to_campaign/add_lead_to_campaign.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the 'app' object from the relative path. This is likely the main app object containing API methods for TheMagicDrip interactions.
1-72: Overall, excellent implementation of the "Add Lead to Campaign" action.This new action aligns well with the PR objectives, specifically addressing the requirement to add a single lead to a campaign. The implementation is clean, readable, and modular, following good practices for action definition in the context of the TheMagicDrip component.
Key strengths:
- Clear and comprehensive props definition, allowing for flexible lead data input.
- Efficient use of destructuring and async/await in the run method.
- Proper integration with the TheMagicDrip app object for API calls.
The suggested improvements (versioning, URL validation, and error handling) are minor and aimed at enhancing robustness and maintainability. Overall, this implementation successfully fulfills its intended purpose within the larger context of the PR.
components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (5)
54-62:⚠️ Potential issueInclude lead data in addLeadToCampaign method
The
addLeadToCampaignmethod does not currently accept or utilize lead information such as thelinkedinUrl. To add a lead to a campaign effectively, you should include the lead data in the request body.Modify the method to accept lead data and pass it in the request:
async addLeadToCampaign({ - campaignId, ...opts + campaignId, leadData = {}, ...opts }) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: `/campaign/leads/${campaignId}`, + data: leadData, ...opts, }); },Ensure that when invoking
addLeadToCampaign, you provide the necessary lead information, including optional parameters likelinkedinUrl.Run the following script to verify the API endpoint and required lead data fields:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the API documentation for required lead data fields # Test: Fetch API documentation. Expect: Documentation contains required fields for adding a lead. curl -s "https://api.themagicdrip.com/docs" | grep -A 10 "Add Lead to Campaign"This will help confirm the required structure of
leadDataand ensure compliance with the API expectations.
74-78: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionHandle pagination in listTemplates method if applicable
If the API supports pagination for listing templates, consider implementing pagination handling in the
listTemplatesmethod to ensure all templates are retrieved.You might adjust the method to handle pagination parameters:
async listTemplates(opts = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/templates", + params: { + page: opts.page || 1, + per_page: opts.per_page || 50, + }, ...opts, }); },Ensure to document the pagination options and how to use them.
Run the following script to verify if the API supports pagination:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check API documentation for pagination support in listing templates # Test: Fetch API documentation. Expect: Documentation includes pagination parameters for templates endpoint. curl -s "https://api.themagicdrip.com/docs" | grep -A 10 "List Templates"
63-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure consistency between desiredState and activate parameters
The
markCampaignActiveInactivemethod uses the parameteractivate, while the property definition usesdesiredState. For clarity and consistency, consider using the same parameter name in both places.Rename the parameter in the method to
desiredState:async markCampaignActiveInactive({ - campaignId, activate, ...opts + campaignId, desiredState, ...opts }) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: `/campaign/${campaignId}/${desiredState - ? "active" + ? "active" : "inactive"}`, ...opts, }); },This change ensures that the property
desiredStatedirectly maps to the method parameter, reducing potential confusion.Run the following script to check for consistent usage of
desiredStateacross the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `desiredState` is used consistently # Test: Search for occurrences of `desiredState` and `activate`. Expect: Only `desiredState` is used as a parameter. rg --type js 'desiredState|activate' components/the_magic_drip/
1-81:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure compliance with API authentication requirements
The current implementation passes the API key in the header
x-api-key. Verify that this aligns with the API's authentication requirements. Some APIs require the API key to be passed in theAuthorizationheader or as a query parameter.Run the following script to confirm the correct authentication method:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the API authentication requirements # Test: Fetch API authentication documentation. Expect: Documentation specifies header `x-api-key`. curl -s "https://api.themagicdrip.com/docs/authentication" | grep -i "API Key Authentication"Update the code if necessary to match the API's expected authentication method.
12-17:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the structure of the response from listCampaigns
The destructuring assignment
const { campaigns } = await this.listCampaigns();assumes that the response fromlistCampaigns()has a propertycampaigns. Please verify that the API response actually contains acampaignsproperty. If the API returns the campaigns array directly or the property name is different, you may need to adjust the code accordingly.Run the following script to inspect the structure of the API response:
Replace
YOUR_API_KEYwith your actual API key. This will display the response in JSON format, allowing you to verify the correct property name.
| key: "the_magic_drip-mark-campaign-active-inactive", | ||
| name: "Mark Campaign Active or Inactive", | ||
| description: "Marks a campaign as active or inactive. [See the documentation](https://docs.themagicdrip.com/api-reference/endpoint/post-v1campaign-active)", | ||
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", | |
| version: "0.0.1", |
| key: "the_magic_drip-add-lead-to-campaign", | ||
| name: "Add Lead to Campaign", | ||
| description: "Add a lead to a campaign. [See the documentation](https://docs.themagicdrip.com/api-reference/endpoint/post-v1campaignleads)", | ||
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| version: "0.0.{{ts}}", | |
| version: "0.0.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-campaigns/list-campaigns.mjs (3)
3-11: LGTM: Action metadata is well-structured and informative.The metadata provides all necessary information for the action, including a helpful link to the API documentation. The namespaced key and inclusion of the
appinstance in props are good practices.Consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") for the initial release instead of "0.0.1", unless there's a specific reason for using a pre-release version.
12-18: LGTM: Therunmethod is well-implemented with proper error handling.The method correctly uses async/await for the API call and provides a helpful summary of the operation. The use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators ensures safe handling of the response.
There's a small typo in the summary message. Please correct "Sucessfully" to "Successfully".
- $.export("$summary", `Sucessfully retrieved ${campaigns?.length ?? 0} campaigns`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${campaigns?.length ?? 0} campaigns`);
1-19: Overall, excellent implementation of the "List Campaigns" action.This implementation successfully addresses the PR objective to list available campaigns without requiring additional properties beyond the application context. The code is well-structured, follows good practices, and includes helpful documentation links.
As the component grows, consider implementing error handling for API calls and potentially adding pagination support if the number of campaigns could be large.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-templates/list-templates.mjs (1)
3-8: LGTM: Metadata is well-structured and informative.The action metadata is complete and follows best practices:
- The key is properly namespaced.
- The name and description are clear and informative.
- The description includes a link to the API documentation, which is helpful for users.
Consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0") for the initial release instead of "0.0.1", unless there's a specific reason for using a pre-release version.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-campaign-created/new-campaign-created.mjs (1)
5-10: Consider enhancing the description for clarity.The metadata properties are well-defined. However, the description could be more informative about the specific functionality of this source.
Consider updating the description to:
- description: "Emit new event when a campaign is created. [See the documentation](https://docs.themagicdrip.com/api-reference/endpoint/get-v1campaign)", + description: "Emits a new event when a campaign is created in TheMagicDrip. [See the API documentation](https://docs.themagicdrip.com/api-reference/endpoint/get-v1campaign)",components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs (1)
5-10: LGTM: Well-structured source configurationThe source configuration is complete and well-structured. The inclusion of the API documentation link is particularly helpful.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the chosen deduplication strategy ("unique") and its implications for this specific source.
components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive.mjs (2)
23-38: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider adding error handling.The
runmethod is well-implemented:
- Async function is appropriate for API interactions.
- Proper destructuring of properties.
- Correct method call to
app.markCampaignActiveInactive.- Dynamic summary message generation.
- Consistent use of
$for platform conventions.Consider adding try-catch block for error handling:
async run({ $ }) { const { campaignId, activate } = this; try { const response = await this.app.markCampaignActiveInactive({ $, campaignId, activate, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully ${activate ? "" : "de"}activated campaign`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to ${activate ? "" : "de"}activate campaign: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }This will provide more informative error messages and maintain consistent behavior.
1-39: Great implementation of the "Mark Campaign Active or Inactive" action.This file successfully implements the action to mark a campaign as active or inactive, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, follows best practices, and includes all necessary components:
- Proper import and module definition
- Well-defined props with clear descriptions
- An async run method that interacts with the API
The implementation is correct, logical, and avoids common pitfalls. It's secure, performant, and maintainable.
To further improve the module:
- Consider adding input validation for the
campaignIdandactivateprops.- Implement unit tests to ensure the action behaves correctly under various scenarios.
- Add logging for important steps in the
runmethod to aid in debugging and monitoring.components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (1)
62-72: Simplify the markCampaignActiveInactive method.The ternary operator in the path construction can be simplified for better readability.
Consider applying this diff to simplify the path construction:
async markCampaignActiveInactive({ campaignId, activate, ...opts }) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", - path: `/campaign/${campaignId}/${activate - ? "active" - : "inactive"}`, + path: `/campaign/${campaignId}/${activate ? "active" : "inactive"}`, ...opts, }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/add-lead-to-campaign/add-lead-to-campaign.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-campaigns/list-campaigns.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-templates/list-templates.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-campaign-created/new-campaign-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-campaigns/list-campaigns.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and concise.The import statement correctly imports the
appinstance from the relative path. This follows good practices by importing only what's needed.components/the_magic_drip/actions/list-templates/list-templates.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
appinstance from the relative path. This follows best practices and ensures the action has access to the necessary API methods.
9-11: LGTM: Props are correctly defined.The
appprop is properly defined, allowing the action to access the Magic Drip API methods. This matches the import statement and follows the expected pattern for integrating with the app instance.
1-19: Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectives.This new "List Templates" action successfully implements one of the key objectives outlined in the PR:
- List Templates: Enable the listing of available templates without needing extra properties beyond the application context.
The implementation correctly uses the
appinstance to interact with the Magic Drip API, retrieves the templates, and returns them. With the suggested improvements (fixing the typo and adding error handling), this action will provide a robust and user-friendly way to list available templates.To ensure this implementation is consistent with other actions in the component, let's check for similar patterns:
This will help verify that the implementation follows the established patterns in the component.
✅ Verification successful
Summary: Implementation follows established component patterns.
The "List Templates" action adheres to the established structure and conventions used in other actions within the
the_magic_dripcomponent. This consistency ensures maintainability and aligns with the project's design standards.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar action implementations in the_magic_drip component # Test: Look for other action files with similar structure rg --type js -g 'components/the_magic_drip/actions/**/*.mjs' -A 10 'export default \{'Length of output: 5095
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-campaign-created/new-campaign-created.mjs (2)
1-11: LGTM: Well-structured module with proper imports and object composition.The code follows good practices by importing a common module and extending it with specific properties for this source. The object structure is clear and concise.
1-27: Overall, good implementation with room for improved error handling.The module successfully implements a source for new campaign creation events. It extends common functionality and provides necessary methods for working with campaign data. To further enhance reliability:
- Implement the suggested error handling and input validation.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of each method, especially with edge cases and unexpected inputs.
- Ensure that the
app.listCampaigns()method is properly implemented and documented in the common module or application context.To verify the implementation of
app.listCampaigns(), you can run the following script:This will help ensure that the method this module depends on is properly implemented.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs (2)
1-5: LGTM: Good use of common moduleThe import statement and the use of the spread operator to extend the common module demonstrate good code reuse and maintainability.
1-27: Summary: Implementation aligns with PR objectivesThis new source module for detecting new template creation events aligns well with the PR objectives, specifically addressing the "List Templates" and "Polling Sources" requirements. The implementation extends common functionality, provides methods for template retrieval and processing, and sets up the necessary structure for emitting events when new templates are created.
While the core functionality is in place, consider implementing the suggested improvements for error handling and robustness to enhance the module's reliability.
To ensure this implementation fully meets the requirements, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the implementation meets the key requirements and follows the expected structure.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All Tests Passed
The implementation of the
new-template-createdsource has been successfully verified. All required methods are present, the source key is correctly formatted, the common module is properly imported, and the API documentation link is included as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new-template-created source # Test 1: Check if the source key matches the expected format echo "Checking source key..." grep -q 'key: "the_magic_drip-new-template-created",' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "Source key is correct" || echo "Source key is incorrect" # Test 2: Verify the presence of required methods echo "Checking for required methods..." grep -q 'async getItems()' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "getItems method found" || echo "getItems method missing" grep -q 'getItemId(item)' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "getItemId method found" || echo "getItemId method missing" grep -q 'getItemMetadata(item)' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "getItemMetadata method found" || echo "getItemMetadata method missing" # Test 3: Check if the source is using the common module echo "Checking for common module usage..." grep -q 'import common from "../common.mjs"' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "Common module imported correctly" || echo "Common module import missing" # Test 4: Verify the presence of API documentation link echo "Checking for API documentation link..." grep -q 'https://docs.themagicdrip.com/api-reference/endpoint/get-v1templates' components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs && echo "API documentation link found" || echo "API documentation link missing"Length of output: 1420
components/the_magic_drip/actions/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive/mark-campaign-active-or-inactive.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM: Module definition and metadata look good.The import statement and module definition are well-structured. The key, name, description, and version are appropriately set, providing clear documentation for the action.
9-22: LGTM: Props are well-defined and align with the action's purpose.The props object is correctly structured with:
- An
appprop for the application instance.- A
campaignIdprop using a reusable propDefinition.- An
activateboolean prop with a clear label and description.These props provide the necessary inputs for the action.
components/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjs (5)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
axiosfrom "@pipedream/platform" is appropriate for making HTTP requests in this context.
3-5: LGTM: App definition is correct.The app definition with type "app" and name "the_magic_drip" follows the expected structure.
32-34: LGTM: Other methods are well-implemented.The
_baseUrl,listCampaigns,addLeadToCampaign, andlistTemplatesmethods are correctly implemented and provide the necessary functionality for interacting with the API.Also applies to: 47-77
80-80: LGTM: File closure is correct.The file properly closes the default export object with a closing curly brace and semicolon.
6-30: LGTM: Property definitions are well-structured.The
propDefinitionsforcampaignId,linkedinUrl, anddesiredStateare correctly defined with appropriate labels and descriptions. ThecampaignIdoptions method looks good, but its functionality depends on thelistCampaignsmethod defined later in the file.To ensure the
listCampaignsmethod is correctly implemented, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Verified:
listCampaignsmethod is correctly implemented inthe_magic_drip.app.mjs.The
listCampaignsmethod incomponents/the_magic_drip/the_magic_drip.app.mjsis properly defined and aligns with its usage in thepropDefinitions. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the listCampaigns method implementation # Test: Search for the listCampaigns method definition ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'async listCampaigns($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the listCampaigns method implementation with corrected pattern # Test: Search for the listCampaigns method definition with a refined pattern ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'async listCampaigns() { $$$ }'Length of output: 522
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the listCampaigns method implementation using ripgrep # Test: Search for the listCampaigns method definition with context lines rg 'async listCampaigns' -A 5Length of output: 3478
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add-lead-to-campaign/add-lead-to-campaign.mjs (3)
23-27: Verify required fields align with API specificationsThe
lastNameprop is required whilefirstNameis optional. Ensure that this aligns with TheMagicDrip API's requirements. If both names are required or if additional fields are necessary, adjust the props accordingly.
46-51: Clarify the structure ofcustomVariablesThe
customVariablesprop is defined as an object. Verify that the API accepts custom variables in this format. If the API expects a specific structure or schema for custom variables, consider adding validation or a more detailed definition to ensure data integrity.
57-65: Verify request payload matches API expectationsEnsure that the payload structure passed to
app.addLeadToCampaignaligns with the API requirements. Confirm thatleadsWithCustomVariablesis the correct key and that the lead data is formatted as expected by the API.
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-campaign-created/new-campaign-created.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-campaign-created/new-campaign-created.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/sources/new-template-created/new-template-created.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add-lead-to-campaign/add-lead-to-campaign.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add-lead-to-campaign/add-lead-to-campaign.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/the_magic_drip/actions/add-lead-to-campaign/add-lead-to-campaign.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
/approve |
Closes #14196
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
campaignId,linkedinUrl, anddesiredState.Bug Fixes
Documentation