Skip to content

Conversation

@johnzl-777
Copy link
Contributor

As a consequence of the revisions requested from #11 some of my original comments don't make sense with the new naming scheme so I opted to either remove/revise them so future maintenance doesn't get too confusing due to them

@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 requested a review from Roger-luo April 14, 2025 02:24
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
6139 5260 86% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

File Coverage Status
src/bloqade/squin/analysis/nsites/analysis.py 84% 🟢
TOTAL 84% 🟢

updated for commit: b6ff64c by action🐍

@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 merged commit 0253a76 into main Apr 14, 2025
11 checks passed
@johnzl-777 johnzl-777 deleted the john/revise-nsites-analysis-comments branch April 14, 2025 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants