- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 12
 
Bump 1.4.9 #61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump 1.4.9 #61
Conversation
…nd update dynamixel model list
…ultiDxlRead and SetMultiDxlWrite functions
…for ffw sensor model
…ctions for improved readability
Support ffw sensor board
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the dynamixel_hardware_interface package to version 1.4.9. The primary focus of these changes is to extend support for new Dynamixel sensor models, particularly those under the 'ffw' series, by adding their control table definitions. Additionally, the PR refines the internal communication logic for Dynamixel devices, making the read and write operations more robust, especially for single-device interactions.
Highlights
- Version Bump: The package version has been incremented to 
1.4.9acrosspackage.xmlandCHANGELOG.rst, signifying a new release. - New Dynamixel Model Support: Added definitions for several new Dynamixel models, including 
omy_hat,omy_end,ffw_g40_imu,ffw_g10_led, and variousffw_sg2models. This includes the introduction of new model files (ffw_g10_led.modelandffw_g40_imu.model) detailing their specific control tables, directly addressing the 'Support ffw sensor model' noted in the changelog. - Refined Communication Logic: The internal 
Dynamixelclass now more robustly handles multi-Dynamixel read/write operations. Specifically,checkReadType()andcheckWriteType()have been updated to ensure that single-item operations correctly fall back to bulk communication if indirect read/write is not supported, improving reliability for single-device interactions. 
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description | 
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review | 
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. | 
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary | 
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. | 
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. | 
| Help | /gemini help | 
Displays a list of available commands. | 
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
- 
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request bumps the package version to 1.4.9, adds support for new FFW sensor models, and refines the logic for selecting between SYNC and BULK communication protocols. The selection logic now correctly handles single-device scenarios, especially for devices that do not support indirect addressing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.