Skip to content

Conversation

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive self-assigned this Jun 25, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive added the bump Increase the version number to release label Jun 25, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🌱 Todo in Platform Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the dynamixel_hardware_interface package to version 1.4.9. The primary focus of these changes is to extend support for new Dynamixel sensor models, particularly those under the 'ffw' series, by adding their control table definitions. Additionally, the PR refines the internal communication logic for Dynamixel devices, making the read and write operations more robust, especially for single-device interactions.

Highlights

  • Version Bump: The package version has been incremented to 1.4.9 across package.xml and CHANGELOG.rst, signifying a new release.
  • New Dynamixel Model Support: Added definitions for several new Dynamixel models, including omy_hat, omy_end, ffw_g40_imu, ffw_g10_led, and various ffw_sg2 models. This includes the introduction of new model files (ffw_g10_led.model and ffw_g40_imu.model) detailing their specific control tables, directly addressing the 'Support ffw sensor model' noted in the changelog.
  • Refined Communication Logic: The internal Dynamixel class now more robustly handles multi-Dynamixel read/write operations. Specifically, checkReadType() and checkWriteType() have been updated to ensure that single-item operations correctly fall back to bulk communication if indirect read/write is not supported, improving reliability for single-device interactions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request bumps the package version to 1.4.9, adds support for new FFW sensor models, and refines the logic for selecting between SYNC and BULK communication protocols. The selection logic now correctly handles single-device scenarios, especially for devices that do not support indirect addressing.

Copy link
Member

@DongyunRobotis DongyunRobotis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🌱 Todo to 📝 Pull Request in Platform Jun 25, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive merged commit dac08f7 into humble Jun 25, 2025
25 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📝 Pull Request to 🚩Done in Platform Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bump Increase the version number to release

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants