Skip to content

Conversation

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link
Member

Add new Dynamixel model files

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive self-assigned this Jul 28, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 28, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🌱 Todo in Platform Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly expands the range of supported Dynamixel servo motors by integrating new model definitions and updating the central model registry. It also includes minor refinements to an existing model's configuration, enhancing compatibility and accuracy for robotic applications utilizing these actuators.

Highlights

  • New Dynamixel Model Support: This pull request introduces support for 18 new Dynamixel servo motor models by adding their respective .model configuration files. These files define critical parameters such as radian limits, unit conversions, and a comprehensive control table for each motor.
  • Model Registry Update: The central param/dxl_model/dynamixel.model file has been updated to include references to all the newly added Dynamixel models, ensuring they are properly registered and discoverable within the system.
  • Existing Model Refinement: An existing model definition, ph42_020_s300.model, has been updated. This includes removing a redundant 'Velocity Limit' entry, renaming 'Secondary(Shadow) ID' to 'Secondary ID', and adding new control table entries for 'External Port Mode' and 'External Port Data' registers, likely reflecting firmware updates or improved parameter definitions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds new Dynamixel model files and updates the main model index. The changes look good overall. Please improve the consistency and maintainability of the new model files by sorting control table entries by their address and using consistent separators.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive moved this from 🌱 Todo to 📝 Pull Request in Platform Aug 11, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2025 06:57
Copy link
Member

@yun-goon yun-goon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good!

Copy link
Member

@sunghowoo sunghowoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive merged commit 30fe4d3 into main Aug 13, 2025
11 checks passed
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive deleted the feature-model-support branch August 13, 2025 02:11
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📝 Pull Request to 🚩Done in Platform Aug 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants