docs: Fix typos and settings order#2785
Conversation
validcube
changed the title
| Enabling this will allow you to change the patch selection | ||
| > ⚠️ Warning | ||
| > Changing the selection may cause unexpected issues. | ||
| > Unless you know what you are doing, it is recommended to keep this disabled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In 1.26.0-dev.7, this option is enabled by default. Is that a bug, or does this warning need to be changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is enabled by default yes, this is not "expected", I already notified the team in discord.
|
Please look into #2780 (comment) as well. |
|
Settings aren't considered final, this PR should be postponed |
| <string name="auto_update_description">Automatically update when a new version is available</string> | ||
| <string name="patches_prereleases">Use pre-releases</string> | ||
| <string name="patches_prereleases_description">Use pre-release version of %s</string> | ||
| <string name="patches_prereleases_description">Use pre-release versions of %s</string> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <string name="patches_prereleases_description">Use pre-release versions of %s</string> | |
| <string name="patches_prereleases_description">Use pre-release version of %s</string> |
Isn't it better to use version at both places?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In that case the toggle titles will also need to be singular. Currently they are plural ("Use pre-releases")
Also, I think "versions" better reflects that the patches and Manager are constantly updated. There isn't a single pre-release version. Rather, it is constantly changing. Not sure if I'm explaining myself well. I understand your perspective too 😅
Isn't it best to have it reflect the current state of settings? If the settings are changed, a new PR can be opened in the future. I wish not to have this PR hang open, because then I will be responsible to reflect all future changes and mistakes. I don't like putting workloads on myself, so I was hoping this would quickly be merged or closed. Same for my other PR: #2791 |
I don't think this PR should be postponed, this PR is relating to the current branch |
4 participants
No description provided.