Skip to content

Conversation

@fmauch
Copy link
Contributor

@fmauch fmauch commented Sep 23, 2024

closes #934, closes #789 and closes #1044.

This should hopefully significantly improve the usage documentation for end users and clarify a couple of things.

I'm not done, yet, hence the draft status.

@fmauch fmauch marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 20:05
@fmauch fmauch requested review from VinDp and urrsk September 23, 2024 20:05
@urrsk
Copy link
Member

urrsk commented Sep 26, 2024

  • Renaming all ros_control to ros2_control

Felix Exner (fexner) and others added 4 commits October 1, 2024 10:21
@fmauch fmauch requested a review from urrsk October 1, 2024 08:44
@fmauch fmauch merged commit 1d1f4c5 into UniversalRobots:main Oct 1, 2024
11 checks passed
@fmauch fmauch deleted the doc_read_to_receive_control_commands branch October 1, 2024 12:13
URJala pushed a commit to URJala/Universal_Robots_ROS2_Driver that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
* Add section about operation modes
* Get some usage things straight
* Restructure usage into subdirectory
* Improved startup instructions
* Added move page to usage
* Add troubleshooting section
* Add note about mock hardware simulation
* Added information on controllers
* Update ROS_INTERFACE by splitting it up into individual files
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Rune Søe-Knudsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document robot not ready to receive control commands Update the ROS node documentation joint_trajectory_controller inactive with ursim

2 participants