Skip to content

Conversation

@brasseld
Copy link
Contributor

@brasseld brasseld commented Jul 3, 2025

Description

This PR is made for better organize the different sub-modules, essentially the core one by extracing the specification (the model) from the client, in a similar way as what as been done for the server part.

The goal for this split is to make it easier to provide other client implementation in a near future.

Although code as been spread across new modules, it does not impact the way it is used as the same packages as been kept. Therefore, it does not impact much the main readme

  • [X ] Follow the CONTRIBUTING Guide.
  • [ X] Make your Pull Request title in the https://www.conventionalcommits.org/ specification.
    • Important Prefixes for release-please:
      • fix: which represents bug fixes, and correlates to a SemVer patch.
      • feat: represents a new feature, and correlates to a SemVer minor.
      • feat!:, or fix!:, refactor!:, etc., which represent a breaking change (indicated by the !) and will result in a SemVer major.
  • [ X] Ensure the tests pass
  • [ X] Appropriate READMEs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @brasseld, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the project's modularity by extracting the client-specific parts from the core module. This change aims to facilitate the addition of alternative client implementations in the future without significantly impacting the existing API or requiring major changes to the main README.

Highlights

  • Module Reorganization: The core module has been reorganized to separate the client specification (model) from the client implementation. This mirrors the existing structure for the server part.
  • New Modules: Two new modules, a2a-java-sdk-common and a2a-java-sdk-model, have been introduced to house common utilities and the data model, respectively.
  • Dependency Updates: Dependencies within the modules have been updated to reflect the new module structure. For example, the a2a-java-sdk-client now depends on a2a-java-sdk-common and a2a-java-sdk-model.
  • Package Changes: The package io.a2a.spec has been moved to the model module, and the io.a2a package in the core module has been moved to the client module.
  • Code Modernization: The source and target maven compiler plugins have been updated to Java 21.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request reorganizes the project's modules for better structure and future extensibility by extracting client, model, and common functionalities from the core module. I've provided suggestions to enhance code quality and maintainability, including documenting the Java version upgrade, removing code duplication, correcting an import, and improving code clarity.

@brasseld brasseld force-pushed the split_modules branch 3 times, most recently from f79e392 to 8389879 Compare July 3, 2025 11:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@kabir kabir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @brasseld thanks for the PR!

I have a few comments mostly about:

  • using wildcard imports - we like those to be explicit
  • Removing the static import of Utils.OBJECT_MAPPER - this is more of a nit, but at the same time it seems like a pointless change.

I don't think there is much point in keeping the core package just for JSONRPCErrorSerializationTest. Can that test be moved to model/ or client? This might not be in your branch actually, but I see the file there after rebasing on main. So please rebase and you will see what I mean

@brasseld brasseld force-pushed the split_modules branch 4 times, most recently from 2a2fd3a to f497213 Compare July 3, 2025 12:55
Copy link
Collaborator

@kabir kabir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @brasseld I think it looks better now. Sadly there are some conflicts that need to be resolved before we can merge it.

@brasseld
Copy link
Contributor Author

brasseld commented Jul 4, 2025

Fixed @kabir

<dependency>
<groupId>io.a2a.sdk</groupId>
<artifactId>a2a-java-sdk-core</artifactId>
<artifactId>a2a-java-sdk-client</artifactId>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be a2a-java-sdk-spec

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the README, the "Add the A2A Java SDK Core Maven dependency to your project" should be reworded to "Add the A2A Java SDK Spec Maven dependency to your project"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hum not sure about this one tbh.

Now that we splitted client and server modules, there should be two different imports:

  • One for a2a-java-sdk-client if you want to use the client part of the SDK
  • One for a2a-java-sdk-server-common if you want to use the server part of the SDK

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This part of the README goes through the steps for creating an A2A server agent. In this first step, the a2a-java-sdk-spec dependency needs to be added in order to be able to create the AgentCard producer and AgentExecutor producer. A later step shows how to add the a2a-java-sdk-server-quarkus or a2a-java-sdk-server-jakarta dependency to expose the A2A server endpoint. The client dependency shouldn't be needed for creating a server agent.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the dependency on a2a-java-sdk-server-quarkus or a2a-java-sdk-server-jakarta would also bring in the dependency on a2a-java-sdk-spec. So I guess the question is if we want to be explicit about it or not.

Let's see what @kabir thinks.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think transitive dependencies are fine in this case.

@brasseld
Copy link
Contributor Author

brasseld commented Jul 4, 2025

Fixed @fjuma

<dependency>
<groupId>io.a2a.sdk</groupId>
<artifactId>a2a-java-sdk-core</artifactId>
<artifactId>a2a-java-sdk-client</artifactId>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, we also need a dependency on a2a-java-sdk-spec.

@brasseld brasseld force-pushed the split_modules branch 2 times, most recently from d88ecb3 to 3c77069 Compare July 4, 2025 15:10
@brasseld
Copy link
Contributor Author

brasseld commented Jul 7, 2025

Hey @fjuma , @kabir do you need anything else from me on this one before going ahead and merge it ?

@fjuma
Copy link
Collaborator

fjuma commented Jul 7, 2025

@brasseld Just merged #166 so this will now need another rebase along with the change mentioned here:

#166 (comment)

…re to ease client extensibility with new implementation
@kabir
Copy link
Collaborator

kabir commented Jul 7, 2025

@brasseld @fjuma I've added Farah's suggestions and force pushed this branch (I have the necessary GH permissions). Let's see how CI goes

Copy link
Collaborator

@fjuma fjuma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks very much @brasseld and @kabir!

@fjuma fjuma merged commit 2a881cb into a2aproject:main Jul 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@fjuma fjuma mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
4 tasks
kabir pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
# Description

Thank you for opening a Pull Request!
Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make
sure it goes smoothly:

- [x] Follow the [`CONTRIBUTING` Guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] Make your Pull Request title in the
<https://www.conventionalcommits.org/> specification.
- Important Prefixes for
[release-please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please):
- `fix:` which represents bug fixes, and correlates to a
[SemVer](https://semver.org/) patch.
- `feat:` represents a new feature, and correlates to a SemVer minor.
- `feat!:`, or `fix!:`, `refactor!:`, etc., which represent a breaking
change (indicated by the `!`) and will result in a SemVer major.
- [x] Ensure the tests pass
- [x] Appropriate READMEs were updated (if necessary)

Follows up on #149
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants