[PR #11938/d09103a5 backport][3.14] Add Windows 11 ARM64 to CI/CD workflow matrix

[patchback]

This is a backport of PR #11938 as merged into master (d09103a).

What do these changes do?

This adds the Windows 11 arm64 runner image for github actions to the CI/CD workflow matrix to ensure that the win_arm64 wheel gets built. Without this I cannot use --platform that passes in win_arm64 into pip to install all of the packages in my requirements.txt which include discord.py, asqlite, and aiohttp. With this change there is a chance that aiohttp could get a win_arm64 wheel published to pypi just like with yarl and multidict to name a few binary packages that are dependencies of aiohttp.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No changes, other than allowing one to pip install aiohttp using it's --platform argument which forces install from wheels as the only valid option, without arm64 wheels it will try to install version 0.13.1 of aiohttp which is not supported in many packages (many packages supports aiohttp<4,>=3.7.4, only).

Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?

Nope, all this does is adds the new arm64 windows github actions runner to build the win_arm64 wheel for publish to pypi.

Related issue number

Fixes #11937

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist (I doubt unit tests are needed for a minor CI change)
• Documentation reflects the changes (No doc changes are needed)
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt (No code changes are provided.)
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES/ folder

  • name it <issue_or_pr_num>.<type>.rst (e.g. 588.bugfix.rst)

  • if you don't have an issue number, change it to the pull request
    number after creating the PR

    • .bugfix: A bug fix for something the maintainers deemed an
      improper undesired behavior that got corrected to match
      pre-agreed expectations.
    • .feature: A new behavior, public APIs. That sort of stuff.
    • .deprecation: A declaration of future API removals and breaking
      changes in behavior.
    • .breaking: When something public is removed in a breaking way.
      Could be deprecated in an earlier release.
    • .doc: Notable updates to the documentation structure or build
      process.
    • .packaging: Notes for downstreams about unobvious side effects
      and tooling. Changes in the test invocation considerations and
      runtime assumptions.
    • .contrib: Stuff that affects the contributor experience. e.g.
      Running tests, building the docs, setting up the development
      environment.
    • .misc: Changes that are hard to assign to any of the above
      categories.

  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation,
    for example:

    Fixed issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files
    -- by :user:`contributor-gh-handle`.

    Use the past tense or the present tense a non-imperative mood,
    referring to what's changed compared to the last released version
    of this project.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.22%. Comparing base (2fc38fe) to head (a195a6c).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on 3.14.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.14   #11958   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.22%   98.22%           
=======================================
  Files         128      128           
  Lines       44915    44915           
  Branches     2425     2425           
=======================================
  Hits        44117    44117           
  Misses        615      615           
  Partials      183      183           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.10% <ø> (ø)
OS-Linux	97.86% <ø> (ø)
OS-Windows	95.59% <ø> (ø)
OS-macOS	97.10% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.10.11	96.63% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.10.19	97.12% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.11.14	97.37% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.11.9	96.87% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.12.10	96.96% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.12.12	97.45% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.13.11	97.68% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.14.2	97.67% <ø> (ø)
Py-3.14.2t	96.76% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-pypy3.11.13-7.3.20	96.90% <ø> (ø)
VM-macos	97.10% <ø> (ø)
VM-ubuntu	97.86% <ø> (ø)
VM-windows	95.59% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing patchback/backports/3.14/d09103a5baed801a0d475a79270cc08b205110bb/pr-11938 (a195a6c) with 3.14 (2fc38fe)¹}

Summary

✅ 59 untouched benchmarks

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on 3.14 (4171f86) during the generation of this report, so 2fc38fe was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩