ci(rust): suppress unused features error for unstable non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint only used in arrow_ffi#4055
Merged
lidavidm merged 5 commits intoapache:mainfrom Mar 8, 2026
Conversation
eitsupi
changed the title
non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint for arrow_ffi with nightly clippy
eitsupi
changed the title
non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint for arrow_ffi with nightly clippynon_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint only used in arrow_ffi
Contributor
Author
|
I confirmed with bd23ca1 that this can correctly detect non exhaustive omitted patterns. |
This was referenced Mar 7, 2026
zeroshade
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2026
lidavidm
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems that the latest nightly toolchain has tightened detection of unused features.
Currently, unstable
non_exhaustive_omitted_patternsis only used inadbc_ffi(#3245), so it seems necessaryallow(unused_features)for the other workspace members.This change fixes the Rust CI failure seen in recent PRs.