GH-47800: [C++][CI] Fuzz more CSV reader types#48398
Merged
pitrou merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Dec 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
|
|
Member
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit fuzz |
Member
Author
|
Revision: c4097a9 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e472945c83
|
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting committer review
Member
Author
|
Thanks for the review @WillAyd ! |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit af4f895. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
The CSV fuzz target was fuzz-testing only the threaded table reader. This PR adds fuzz testing for more CSV-reading code paths:
Are these changes tested?
Manually.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.