[CALCITE-7331] Support the alias form SELECT * EXCEPT() for SELECT * EXCLUDE()

[xiedeyantu]

See CALCITE-7331

[xiedeyantu]

Conflicts in #4683 has been resolved.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[xiedeyantu]

I'd like to wait and see if @julianhyde has any other comments.

[xiedeyantu]

If there are no further comments within 48 hours, I will consider merging this PR.

[xiedeyantu]

The discussion is still ongoing on Jira, and we may need to wait for @julianhyde’s input.

[xiedeyantu]

This PR hasn’t received a response from Julian yet. I’m not sure if this will add to the parser’s burden, so should we close this PR?

[julianhyde]

I hate reviewing PRs, so I'm not going to +1 this, but you don't need a +1 from me. If the specification is clear, and the code implements the specification, go ahead and merge.

[xiedeyantu]

I hate reviewing PRs, so I'm not going to +1 this, but you don't need a +1 from me. If the specification is clear, and the code implements the specification, go ahead and merge.

Thank you for your reply. I will add the test cases mentioned in Jira to this PR and continue to complete it.

[xiedeyantu]

I added some tests to the quidem in Babel (from a discussion on Jira), and the conflicts in the main branch of the rebase were resolved. There were no other changes. @mihaibudiu If you have time, could you please check if it's ready?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[mihaibudiu]

this could potentially be configurable, but I guess that people can adapt the parser and choose what they want.

[xiedeyantu]

Yes, we'll keep it simple for now, supporting both, and keeping the configuration parameters as minimal as possible.