Skip to content

Conversation

@jrosental
Copy link
Contributor

@jrosental jrosental commented Jan 28, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated test automation workflow configuration to enhance code coverage monitoring and testing frequency.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a push trigger to the GitHub Actions workflow for the master branch while ignoring tagged pushes. The workflow now executes on both pull requests and pushes to master, expanding its event-driven execution beyond the existing pull request trigger.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow trigger configuration
.github/workflows/test-with-coverage.yml
Adds a push event trigger for the master branch with tags-ignore: ['*.*'] to prevent execution on tagged releases, while maintaining existing pull_request trigger

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • alexeykazakov

Poem

🐰 The workflow now dances both ways,
On pushes and PRs through the days,
Tags take a bow and gracefully pass,
While master's tests run full blast!
CI/CD springs forth with glee,
A swift review is all you need, you'll see! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and specifically describes the main change: adding push event triggers to the workflow for the master branch.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/workflows/test-with-coverage.yml:
- Around line 5-9: The tags-ignore pattern currently set to '*.*' only matches
tags with a dot; update the workflow key tags-ignore under the push trigger to
use '*' instead of '*.*' so all tag pushes are ignored (edit the YAML entry
tags-ignore: to tags-ignore: - '*' preserving indentation and list format).

Comment on lines +5 to +9
push:
branches:
- master
tags-ignore:
- '*.*'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

`tags-ignore: '.' won’t ignore all tag pushes.

This only matches tags containing a dot (e.g., v1.2). If the goal is to ignore all tags, use '*'.

✅ Suggested fix
     tags-ignore:
-      - '*.*'
+      - '*'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
push:
branches:
- master
tags-ignore:
- '*.*'
push:
branches:
- master
tags-ignore:
- '*'
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.github/workflows/test-with-coverage.yml around lines 5 - 9, The tags-ignore
pattern currently set to '*.*' only matches tags with a dot; update the workflow
key tags-ignore under the push trigger to use '*' instead of '*.*' so all tag
pushes are ignored (edit the YAML entry tags-ignore: to tags-ignore: - '*'
preserving indentation and list format).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants