Skip to content

Conversation

@Fsmount
Copy link
Contributor

@Fsmount Fsmount commented Feb 20, 2025

No description provided.

@Fsmount Fsmount requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2025 21:19
@Fsmount Fsmount requested review from colinloretz and removed request for a team February 20, 2025 21:19
Copy link

@brad-discord brad-discord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not too familiar with this space, but I do have some questions.

| application? | [MessageApplication](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/messageapplication) \| null |
| message_reference? | [MessageReference](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/messagereference) \| null |
| flags? | number |
| stickers? | Sticker[] \| null |

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not part of your change, but should Sticker be a link to another part of the docs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if this is an api message object, stickers is deprecated and only present on old messages, and new messages use the sticker_items field

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is yeah, i think the maintainers of the SDK forgot to add sticker_items since it is not present

Comment on lines 1365 to 1364
| mention_channels? | [ChannelMention](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/channelmention)[] |
| attachments | [Attachment](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/attachment)[] |
| embeds | [Embed](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/embed)[] |
| reactions? | [Reaction](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/reaction)[] |
| nonce? | string |
| pinned | boolean |
| webhook_id? | string |
| type | number |
| activity? | [MessageActivity](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/messageactivity) |
| application? | [MessageApplication](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/messageapplication) |
| message_reference? | [MessageReference](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/messagereference) |
| flags? | number |
| stickers? | Sticker[] |
| referenced_message? | [Message](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/message) |
| Property | Type |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| id | string |
| channel_id | string |
| guild_id? | string \| null |
| author? | [User](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/user) \| null |
| member? | [GuildMember](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/guildmember) \| null |
| content | string |
| timestamp | string |
| edited_timestamp? | string \| null |
| tts | boolean |
| mention_everyone | boolean |
| mentions | [User](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/user)[] |
| mention_roles | string[] |
| mention_channels | [ChannelMention](#DOCS_DEVELOPER_TOOLS_EMBEDDED_APP_SDK/channelmention)[] |

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's interesting - what happened to make mention_channels no longer optional in this context? It looks like it's optional on the Message resource

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Fsmount Fsmount Feb 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

either the sdk or Message resource are wrong, I directly checked the sdk's code

@brad-discord
Copy link

Please npm run fix:tables to pass our formatting check. 🙏

Copy link

@brad-discord brad-discord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thank you for the contribution!

@colinloretz colinloretz merged commit 565efb3 into discord:main Feb 24, 2025
4 checks passed
mazylol pushed a commit to mazylol/discord-api-docs that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
* Update Embedded App SDK interfaces

* Update Embedded App SDK enums

* resolve comment

* Format tables via fix:tables
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants