Update pde.ui.tests test suite to JUnit5#1998
Conversation
Test Results 771 files +39 771 suites +39 1h 18m 37s ⏱️ + 26m 3s Results for commit f7ef071. ± Comparison against base commit 01bf84c. This pull request removes 672 and adds 671 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.This pull request removes 25 skipped tests and adds 24 skipped tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
b7af523 to
03edcc0
Compare
| org.hamcrest, | ||
| org.junit, | ||
| org.junit.jupiter.api.function;version="5.8.1", | ||
| org.junit.jupiter.migrationsupport;version="[5.13.0,6.0.0)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this migration!
Is this import really necessary? I don't see it referenced directly or is it implicitly required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it is so that JUnit5 can run older Junit tests.
I just learned yesterday that JUnit6 is already out. :-)
|
The failing tests are unrelated I assume but I will not commit until the build is green, or someone else links to the tracking issue / PR for the failing tests. |
|
My guess would be that some/all of these are related to the introduction of junit 6 in the target platform, e.g., I'm not sure the details of this one: |
|
I fear we have either to revert eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator#3399 or do some tycho / maven fixes or configuration changes to make sure JUnit 6 is not used yet, even if it there on update site. I saw also errors in platform UI which seem to be related: eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.ui#3382 (comment) @trancexpress , @laeubi : FYI. |
|
We won't move forward by moving backward. 😱 I think there are places that need upper bounds, particularly in JDT. If there were hundreds of failures, I'd be concerned, but there appear to be some handful of them... First I will try to reproduce these problems in my SDK workspace where I can easily change anything in any project and in combination. |
Sorry, I hoped you could also take a look at platform.ui tests that most likely need same treatment :-) |
|
Yes, it's on my multi-tasking, long todo list. (Today is also SimRel M1.) |
03edcc0 to
f7ef071
Compare




No description provided.