Do not use Java editor in back/forward test #2703
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
It's a pre-req for #2699 . Semantically there should be no change for the test as it's about navigation between 2 different editors (no matter which ones). |
Contributor
Test was using Generic and Java editors but is now switched to use the DefaultText and Generic editors in an effort to reduce cross repo dependencies.
akurtakov
force-pushed
the
backforward
branch
from
2ddff69 to
343bdbb
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Test was using Generic and Java editors but is now switched to use the DefaultText and Generic editors in an effort to reduce cross repo dependencies.