Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/reference/datatiers.asciidoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ TIP: The performance of an {es} node is often limited by the performance of the
For example hardware profiles, refer to Elastic Cloud's {cloud}/ec-reference-hardware.html[instance configurations].
Review our recommendations for optimizing your storage for <<indexing-use-faster-hardware,indexing>> and <<search-use-faster-hardware,search>>.

IMPORTANT: {es} generally expects nodes within a data tier to share the same
hardware profile. Variations not following this recommendation should be
carefully architected to avoid <<hotspotting,hot spotting>>.
IMPORTANT: {es} generally expects nodes within a data tier to share the same hardware profile (such as CPU, RAM, disk capacity)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
IMPORTANT: {es} generally expects nodes within a data tier to share the same hardware profile (such as CPU, RAM, disk capacity)
IMPORTANT: By default, {es} assumes nodes within a data tier share the same hardware profile (such as CPU, RAM, disk capacity)

Should we potentially take out "generally" and/or add "by default" in order to firm this as baseline expectation? Or go as far to say ES "assumes" this is true so if you want to do different you need to "carefully architect" (I like that phrasing)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just say "Elasticsearch expects"

as it spreads the load equally across all nodes within the data tier.
Variations not following this recommendation should be carefully architected to avoid <<hotspotting,hot spotting>>.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This construction is a little confusing. What steps could someone take to "carefully architect" a node to avoid hot spotting? if we can't provide recommendations, I'd change this to "Data tiers with unequally resourced nodes are at risk of hot spotting."


The way data tiers are used often depends on the data's category:

Expand Down